Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-870
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Released January 2005
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-300
- Replacement is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced January 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus TG-860
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-870 Overview
Below is a detailed assessment of the Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-870, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Ultracompact and both are manufactured by Olympus. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and TG-870 (16MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and TG-870 (1/2.3") feature different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-300 was announced 12 years before the TG-870 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving through a detailed comparison, below is a concise overview of how the E-300 grades against the TG-870 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-870 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-300 and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Olympus TG-870 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus TG-870
E-300 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Olympus E-300
TG-870 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2016 | January 2005 | More recent by 133 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
Display resolution | 921k | 134k | Crisper display (+787k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-870
E-300 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-300 provides external dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Olympus TG-870 has measurements of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-870 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at the time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-300 vs the TG-870.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and TG-870 is 67 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to imagine the difference between sensor measurements merely by looking at a spec sheet. The visual below will provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and TG-870.
As you can see, both of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-300 using its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus TG-870 will resolve more detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-300 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 |
Also referred to as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
Released | 2005-01-10 | 2016-01-06 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 1.8" | 3" |
Display resolution | 134 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 624 grams (1.38 lb) | 221 grams (0.49 lb) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 photos |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $800 | $280 |