Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-870

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front
Portability
91
Imaging
41
Features
46
Overall
43

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Released January 2005
  • Alternative Name is EVOLT E-300
  • Replacement is Olympus E-330
Olympus TG-870
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400 (Expand to 12800)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
  • 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
  • Announced January 2016
  • Earlier Model is Olympus TG-860
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-870 Overview

Below is a detailed assessment of the Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-870, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Ultracompact and both are manufactured by Olympus. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and TG-870 (16MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and TG-870 (1/2.3") feature different sensor dimensions.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-300 was announced 12 years before the TG-870 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before diving through a detailed comparison, below is a concise overview of how the E-300 grades against the TG-870 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus TG-870

 E-300 TG-870 
Manually focus Dial accurate focus

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Olympus E-300

 TG-870 E-300 
AnnouncedJanuary 2016January 2005More recent by 133 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display dimension3"1.8"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution921k134kCrisper display (+787k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-870

 E-300 TG-870 
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lacking Touch friendly display

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison

If you are going to lug around your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-300 provides external dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Olympus TG-870 has measurements of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-870 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at the time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-300 vs the TG-870.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-870 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and TG-870 is 67 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-870 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison

Normally, its tough to imagine the difference between sensor measurements merely by looking at a spec sheet. The visual below will provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and TG-870.

As you can see, both of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-300 using its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus TG-870 will resolve more detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-870 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-300
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-870
48
you can focus manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
no liveview
MP count low (8 megapixels)
36
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
features face detection focusing
no manual focus
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography features
Olympus TG-870 Street photography features
51
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
65
screen tilts up and down
image stabilization (Optical)
environment proofing
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
heavier than competition in class (221 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography highlights
Olympus TG-870 Sports photography highlights
37
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect AF
no liveview
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (8 megapixels)
51
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
environment proofing
great battery life (300 per charge)
no shutter priority
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-300
Travel photography with Olympus TG-870
45
flash built-in
lack of Timelapse recording
MP count low (8 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
69
great battery life (300 per charge)
environment proofing
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
relatively wide (21mm)
heavier than competition in class (221g)
does not have selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.5)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography details
Olympus TG-870 Landscape photography details
43
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
tiny screen (1.8 inch)
no liveview
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (8 megapixels)
maximum ISO low (400)
lack of Timelapse recording
50
relatively wide (21mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
environment proofing
great battery life (300 CIPA)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
manual exposure not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging highlights
Olympus TG-870 Vlogging highlights
9
no video recording
32
relatively wide (21mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
does not have selfie friendly display
missing external mic port
heavier than competition in class (221 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-870
 Olympus E-300Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-300 Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870
Also referred to as EVOLT E-300 -
Class Advanced DSLR Ultracompact
Released 2005-01-10 2016-01-06
Body design Mid-size SLR Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic VII
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3264 x 2448 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 400 6400
Maximum enhanced ISO 1600 12800
Min native ISO 100 125
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 21-105mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture - f/3.5-5.7
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display size 1.8" 3"
Display resolution 134 thousand dot 921 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 3.0fps 7.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - 4.00 m (at ISO 1600)
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624 grams (1.38 lb) 221 grams (0.49 lb)
Dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 300 photos
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom)
Time lapse feature
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Retail cost $800 $280