Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-610
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bac5b/bac5bbb1b3188a701eb58c897a8f12a9e6261c17" alt="Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01ae1/01ae1246b008c2c1438d02f27195e5dcd053dfef" alt="Olympus TG-610 front Olympus TG-610 front"
93 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-610 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Revealed January 2005
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-300
- Renewed by Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 190g - 96 x 65 x 26mm
- Released January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-610 Overview
Following is a in-depth analysis of the Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-610, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Waterproof and they are both designed by Olympus. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and TG-610 (14MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and TG-610 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-300 was manufactured 7 years prior to the TG-610 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-610 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the E-300 grades vs the TG-610 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-610 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-610. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Olympus TG-610 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus TG-610
E-300 | TG-610 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-610 over the Olympus E-300
TG-610 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2011 | ![]() | January 2005 | More modern by 72 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 134k | Sharper screen (+786k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-610
E-300 | TG-610 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-610 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-300 features external measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Olympus TG-610 has sizing of 96mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-610 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at that moment. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the E-300 versus the TG-610.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ced36/ced36ed3c29cd585bc03d76502bb9dcdc34be47f" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-610 size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-610 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and TG-610 is 67 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f901/5f901a95c595c9f17f62d3bc04c0d0b17e9115f4" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-610 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-610 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-610 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizes simply by viewing specifications. The image below will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and TG-610.
To sum up, both cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-300 due to its bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus TG-610 will render more detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be behind in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e46d8/e46d88f4a541eb1b7e6989ccbd9d4734ac260807" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-610 sensor size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-610 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-610 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2508b/2508b5cfb888a78827a3744a9738222a029a1bd2" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-610 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-610 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-610 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Olympus TG-610 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Olympus TG-610 |
Also Known as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2005-01-10 | 2011-01-06 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
Max enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 1.8 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 134k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624g (1.38 lb) | 190g (0.42 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 96 x 65 x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 210 shots |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $800 | $223 |