Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-810
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bac5b/bac5bbb1b3188a701eb58c897a8f12a9e6261c17" alt="Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33564/33564fa180a03f0ad37d4e2877201fb0d473cbdb" alt="Olympus TG-810 front Olympus TG-810 front"
92 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-810 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Released January 2005
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-300
- Replacement is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 215g - 100 x 65 x 26mm
- Released August 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-810 Overview
Here is a comprehensive review of the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-810, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Waterproof and they are both manufactured by Olympus. There exists a big gap between the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and TG-810 (14MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and TG-810 (1/2.3") feature different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-300 was unveiled 7 years prior to the TG-810 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-810 being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a short highlight of how the E-300 matches up versus the TG-810 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-810 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-810. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Olympus TG-810 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus TG-810
E-300 | TG-810 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-810 over the Olympus E-300
TG-810 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2011 | ![]() | January 2005 | Fresher by 80 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 134k | Sharper screen (+786k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-810
E-300 | TG-810 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-810 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-300 has got physical measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-810 has sizing of 100mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-810 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at the time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the E-300 vs the TG-810.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84c49/84c49cced60ea2cccd7afe5daed032ebf03e1bcb" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-810 size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-810 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and TG-810 is 67 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/197fd/197fdefa22f6208a149972ef7fdb3c761a8e18eb" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-810 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-810 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-810 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reading specifications. The graphic underneath may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and TG-810.
Plainly, the two cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-300 with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus TG-810 will offer more detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3158f/3158f93aa450733f9739f2e52f64160dba6debdb" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-810 sensor size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-810 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-810 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/110ae/110ae79123a85f929435df1901008f15dd905e46" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-810 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-810 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-810 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Olympus TG-810 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-300 | Olympus TG-810 |
Also referred to as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Released | 2005-01-10 | 2011-08-16 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 1.8" | 3" |
Display resolution | 134k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 624 grams (1.38 pounds) | 215 grams (0.47 pounds) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 100 x 65 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 images |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $800 | $428 |