Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Olympus TG-830 iHS front
Portability
91
Imaging
40
Features
40
Overall
40

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Introduced January 2005
  • Alternate Name is EVOLT E-300
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-330
Olympus TG-830 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
  • Introduced January 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview

Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof and both are sold by Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and TG-830 iHS (16MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and TG-830 iHS (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-300 was launched 9 years prior to the TG-830 iHS and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-830 iHS being a Compact camera.

Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-300 matches up against the TG-830 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS

 E-300 TG-830 iHS 
Focus manually Dial accurate focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Olympus E-300

 TG-830 iHS E-300 
IntroducedJanuary 2013January 2005More recent by 97 months
Screen dimensions3"1.8"Bigger screen (+1.2")
Screen resolution460k134kSharper screen (+326k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-830 iHS

 E-300 TG-830 iHS 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch screen Neither includes Touch screen

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison

If you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 features outside dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Olympus TG-830 iHS has dimensions of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-300 versus the TG-830 iHS.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and TG-830 iHS is 67 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is tough to visualise the gap in sensor measurements just by viewing technical specs. The photograph underneath may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and TG-830 iHS.

As you can tell, both of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-300 due to its bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus TG-830 iHS will result in greater detail utilizing its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures more aggressively. The older E-300 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-300
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-830 iHS
48
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
no liveview
low MP (8MP)
35
good MP (16 megapixels)
provides face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-300
Street photography with Olympus TG-830 iHS
51
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
fixed screen
no image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
screen does not articulate
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography features
Olympus TG-830 iHS Sports photography features
37
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect AF
no liveview
max fps very slow (3.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
low MP (8 megapixels)
48
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
environment proofing
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography advice
Olympus TG-830 iHS Travel photography advice
45
has built in flash
lack of Time Lapse mode
low MP (8MP)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
67
environment proofing
good MP (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
decently wide (28mm)
no Timelapse function
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography details
Olympus TG-830 iHS Landscape photography details
43
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
screen is small (1.8")
no liveview
no image stabilization
low MP (8MP)
low max ISO (400)
lack of Time Lapse mode
45
decently wide (28mm)
screen is a good size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16MP)
environment proofing
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
manual mode not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
no Timelapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging factors
Olympus TG-830 iHS Vlogging factors
9
lack of video recording
33
decently wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
no external microphone port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-830 iHS
 Olympus E-300Olympus TG-830 iHS
General Information
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-300 Olympus TG-830 iHS
Also referred to as EVOLT E-300 -
Category Advanced DSLR Waterproof
Introduced 2005-01-10 2013-01-08
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3264 x 2448 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 400 6400
Highest boosted ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 3 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.9-5.9
Macro focus range - 1cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 1.8 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 134 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 624g (1.38 pounds) 214g (0.47 pounds)
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 300 shots
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $800 $0