Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bac5b/bac5bbb1b3188a701eb58c897a8f12a9e6261c17" alt="Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ddda/7ddda2c742e5091781c9a412322b0944785f369d" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS front Olympus TG-830 iHS front"
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Introduced January 2005
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-300
- Newer Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof and both are sold by Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and TG-830 iHS (16MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and TG-830 iHS (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-300 was launched 9 years prior to the TG-830 iHS and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-830 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-300 matches up against the TG-830 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-300 & Olympus TG-830 iHS. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
E-300 | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Olympus E-300
TG-830 iHS | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | ![]() | January 2005 | More recent by 97 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 134k | Sharper screen (+326k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-830 iHS
E-300 | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 features outside dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Olympus TG-830 iHS has dimensions of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-300 versus the TG-830 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab9c5/ab9c5f1b4e9a65c6f60ad559a214e2ca15e50490" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and TG-830 iHS is 67 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5a91/f5a916cf6dd9239b5580fe3012871e8c6524bfcc" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to visualise the gap in sensor measurements just by viewing technical specs. The photograph underneath may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and TG-830 iHS.
As you can tell, both of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-300 due to its bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus TG-830 iHS will result in greater detail utilizing its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures more aggressively. The older E-300 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4448d/4448dab2842602dbae07254fde4a1f5913463799" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37f7e/37f7e4f672ade8ab6cea1c081d3c8357ab4d0315" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Olympus TG-830 iHS |
Also referred to as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2005-01-10 | 2013-01-08 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 1.8 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 134 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624g (1.38 pounds) | 214g (0.47 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 shots |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $800 | $0 |