Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bac5b/bac5bbb1b3188a701eb58c897a8f12a9e6261c17" alt="Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9548e/9548e39ccb5afab6cfb852bfe92d7158e2c24b0d" alt="Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS front Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS front"
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Introduced January 2005
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-300
- Renewed by Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
Following is a comprehensive assessment of the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Waterproof and both are offered by Olympus. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-300 was launched 8 years before the TG-1 iHS which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a thorough comparison, below is a short view of how the E-300 matches up against the TG-1 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-300 & Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
E-300 | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Olympus E-300
TG-1 iHS | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2012 | ![]() | January 2005 | More modern by 89 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") |
Display resolution | 610k | ![]() | 134k | Clearer display (+476k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-1 iHS
E-300 | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Absent Touch display |
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-300 features outside dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-1 iHS has sizing of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the E-300 versus the TG-1 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c426/1c426b08c8d214f09ec1ec1446db16aa135cf9a5" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and TG-1 iHS is 67 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9964c/9964c1a86997c84285c24edc198d36d46aca0ce0" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes just by going over technical specs. The picture here may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and TG-1 iHS.
As you have seen, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-300 due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus TG-1 iHS will deliver greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics far more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/297cb/297cba6715a4745cc56557a7b4a73578aed131ba" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07c7e/07c7eafbcc37bea811868a306b2fb2eae42bd813" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-300 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
Also called as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2005-01-10 | 2012-05-08 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Max enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 1.8 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 134k dot | 610k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 624g (1.38 lbs) | 230g (0.51 lbs) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 images |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $800 | $399 |