Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS front
Portability
91
Imaging
36
Features
40
Overall
37

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Introduced January 2005
  • Alternative Name is EVOLT E-300
  • Renewed by Olympus E-330
Olympus TG-1 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
  • Revealed May 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview

Following is a comprehensive assessment of the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Waterproof and both are offered by Olympus. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizing.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-300 was launched 8 years before the TG-1 iHS which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera.

Before we go in to a thorough comparison, below is a short view of how the E-300 matches up against the TG-1 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS

 E-300 TG-1 iHS 
Focus manually More accurate focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Olympus E-300

 TG-1 iHS E-300 
RevealedMay 2012January 2005More modern by 89 months
Display sizing3"1.8"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution610k134kClearer display (+476k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-1 iHS

 E-300 TG-1 iHS 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch display Absent Touch display

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to carry around your camera, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-300 features outside dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-1 iHS has sizing of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the E-300 versus the TG-1 iHS.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and TG-1 iHS is 67 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison

In many cases, its difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes just by going over technical specs. The picture here may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and TG-1 iHS.

As you have seen, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-300 due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus TG-1 iHS will deliver greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics far more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus TG-1 iHS as a Portrait photography camera
48
manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
no liveview
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
27
includes face detect focus
no manual focus
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
resolution not great (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography advice
Olympus TG-1 iHS Street photography advice
51
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
fixed screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-300
Sports photography with Olympus TG-1 iHS
37
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect auto focus
no liveview
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
40
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes tracking focus
weather proofing
great battery pack (350 CIPA)
slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
resolution not great (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography factors
Olympus TG-1 iHS Travel photography factors
45
has built in flash
doesn't have Timelapse function
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
68
great battery pack (350 per charge)
weather proofing
flash built-in
fairly wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
no Time Lapse recording
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
does not feature selfie friendly display
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography factors
Olympus TG-1 iHS Landscape photography factors
43
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
tiny screen (1.8")
no liveview
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (8MP)
low max ISO (400)
doesn't have Timelapse function
46
fairly wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
good sized screen (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
great battery pack (350 CIPA)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
manual mode not available
resolution not great (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
no Time Lapse recording
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-300
Vlogging with Olympus TG-1 iHS
9
can't record video
36
fairly wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does not feature selfie friendly display
no mic port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-1 iHS
 Olympus E-300Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-300 Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS
Also called as EVOLT E-300 -
Class Advanced DSLR Waterproof
Introduced 2005-01-10 2012-05-08
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - TruePic VI
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 3264 x 2448 3968 x 2976
Max native ISO 400 6400
Max enhanced ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 3 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-100mm (4.0x)
Largest aperture - f/2.0-4.9
Available lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 1.8 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 134k dot 610k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash sync 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624g (1.38 lbs) 230g (0.51 lbs)
Dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 350 images
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery ID - LI90B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 and 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II) -
Storage slots One One
Pricing at release $800 $399