Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-3
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Released January 2005
- Also referred to as EVOLT E-300
- Renewed by Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Announced March 2014
- Later Model is Olympus TG-4
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-3 Overview
Here, we are comparing the Olympus E-300 versus Olympus TG-3, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Waterproof and they are both produced by Olympus. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and TG-3 (16MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and TG-3 (1/2.3") posses different sensor size.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-300 was unveiled 10 years prior to the TG-3 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a complete comparison, here is a short summary of how the E-300 matches up vs the TG-3 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-3 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-300 & Olympus Tough TG-3. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Olympus TG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus TG-3
E-300 | TG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Olympus E-300
TG-3 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | March 2014 | January 2005 | More modern by 112 months | |
Display size | 3" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 134k | Clearer display (+326k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-3
E-300 | TG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-3 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-300 features exterior measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") and a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Olympus TG-3 has sizing of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-300 versus Olympus TG-3 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the E-300 compared to the TG-3.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and TG-3 is 67 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-3 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizes merely by reading through specs. The image below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and TG-3.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-300 having a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus TG-3 will give extra detail having an extra 8MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-3 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Olympus Tough TG-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Olympus Tough TG-3 |
Also referred to as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Released | 2005-01-10 | 2014-03-31 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 1.8" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 134 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | - | TFT-LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624 grams (1.38 pounds) | 247 grams (0.54 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 photos |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $800 | $350 |