Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-3

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Olympus Tough TG-3 front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
46
Overall
42

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-3 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Released January 2005
  • Also referred to as EVOLT E-300
  • Renewed by Olympus E-330
Olympus TG-3
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
  • Announced March 2014
  • Later Model is Olympus TG-4
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-3 Overview

Here, we are comparing the Olympus E-300 versus Olympus TG-3, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Waterproof and they are both produced by Olympus. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and TG-3 (16MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and TG-3 (1/2.3") posses different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-300 was unveiled 10 years prior to the TG-3 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera.

Before delving into a complete comparison, here is a short summary of how the E-300 matches up vs the TG-3 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus TG-3

 E-300 TG-3 
Focus manually Very accurate focus

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Olympus E-300

 TG-3 E-300 
AnnouncedMarch 2014January 2005More modern by 112 months
Display size3"1.8"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution460k134kClearer display (+326k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-3

 E-300 TG-3 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly display No Touch friendly display

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-3 Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to carry around your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-300 features exterior measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") and a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Olympus TG-3 has sizing of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-300 versus Olympus TG-3 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the E-300 compared to the TG-3.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-3 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and TG-3 is 67 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-3 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-3 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it's tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizes merely by reading through specs. The image below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and TG-3.

As you can plainly see, both the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-300 having a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus TG-3 will give extra detail having an extra 8MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-3 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-300
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-3
48
manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
no liveview
MP count low (8MP)
37
good resolution (16 megapixels)
supports face detect autofocus
manual focus not available
cannot use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-300
Street photography with Olympus TG-3
51
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
59
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
fixed screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
heavier than competition in class (247 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-300
Sports photography with Olympus TG-3
37
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect AF
no liveview
slow frames per second (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (8 megapixels)
47
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16MP)
supports tracking focus
weather proofing
good battery (330 CIPA)
max frames per second very slow (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography info
Olympus TG-3 Travel photography info
45
built-in flash
no Timelapse function
MP count low (8MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
74
good battery (330 CIPA)
weather proofing
good resolution (16MP)
built-in flash
quite wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
heavier than competition in class (247 grams)
display isn't selfie friendly
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography features
Olympus TG-3 Landscape photography features
43
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
screen is small (1.8 inches)
no liveview
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (8MP)
maximum ISO low (400)
no Timelapse function
56
quite wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16MP)
weather proofing
good battery (330 per charge)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging features
Olympus TG-3 Vlogging features
9
lack of video recording
34
quite wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect autofocus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of mic port
heavier than competition in class (247 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-3
 Olympus E-300Olympus Tough TG-3
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-300 Olympus Tough TG-3
Also referred to as EVOLT E-300 -
Class Advanced DSLR Waterproof
Released 2005-01-10 2014-03-31
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - TruePic VII
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2
Maximum resolution 3264 x 2448 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 400 6400
Maximum boosted ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-100mm (4.0x)
Max aperture - f/2.0-4.9
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Available lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 1.8" 3"
Resolution of display 134 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display technology - TFT-LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 3.0fps 5.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - H.264, Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 624 grams (1.38 pounds) 247 grams (0.54 pounds)
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 330 photos
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery model - LI-92B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom)
Time lapse recording
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory
Storage slots One One
Retail pricing $800 $350