Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-4
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bac5b/bac5bbb1b3188a701eb58c897a8f12a9e6261c17" alt="Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07841/0784163336d0cb666d56989c0f306f52fdaab95d" alt="Olympus Tough TG-4 front Olympus Tough TG-4 front"
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Released January 2005
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-300
- Replacement is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced April 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-3
- Replacement is Olympus TG-5
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
Below is a thorough assessment of the Olympus E-300 versus Olympus TG-4, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are created by Olympus. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and TG-4 (16MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and TG-4 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-300 was brought out 11 years earlier than the TG-4 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the E-300 grades against the TG-4 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-300 & Olympus Tough TG-4. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus TG-4
E-300 | TG-4 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Olympus E-300
TG-4 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | April 2015 | ![]() | January 2005 | More recent by 124 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 134k | Crisper screen (+326k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-4
E-300 | TG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera, you need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 has outer dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Olympus TG-4 has specifications of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-300 versus Olympus TG-4 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at the time. Following is a front view size comparison of the E-300 and the TG-4.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a2b3/3a2b361ab660bae20d17ec17980dbb21238d607f" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-4 size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-4 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and TG-4 is 67 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d8c6e/d8c6e9fda0ebaea86d2d3edee691fc6ad6abea3c" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-4 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-4 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to see the difference between sensor measurements merely by looking at technical specs. The visual underneath should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and TG-4.
As you have seen, both the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-300 because of its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus TG-4 will resolve extra detail having its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e58e/9e58e5d55199ef40125fab931687cde0f9c294b5" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-4 sensor size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-4 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa99c/fa99c2195bc59cf350a866641f40c33e1a87276b" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
Also referred to as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Released | 2005-01-10 | 2015-04-13 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 1.8" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 134k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624 gr (1.38 lbs) | 247 gr (0.54 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 380 shots |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $800 | $379 |