Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-4
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Released January 2005
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-300
- Replacement is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced April 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-3
- Replacement is Olympus TG-5
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
Below is a thorough assessment of the Olympus E-300 versus Olympus TG-4, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are created by Olympus. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and TG-4 (16MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and TG-4 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-300 was brought out 11 years earlier than the TG-4 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the E-300 grades against the TG-4 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-300 & Olympus Tough TG-4. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus TG-4
| E-300 | TG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Olympus E-300
| TG-4 | E-300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | April 2015 | January 2005 | More recent by 124 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 134k | Crisper screen (+326k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-4
| E-300 | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither has Touch screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera, you need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 has outer dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Olympus TG-4 has specifications of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-300 versus Olympus TG-4 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at the time. Following is a front view size comparison of the E-300 and the TG-4.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and TG-4 is 67 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to see the difference between sensor measurements merely by looking at technical specs. The visual underneath should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and TG-4.
As you have seen, both the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-300 because of its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus TG-4 will resolve extra detail having its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
| Olympus E-300 | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus E-300 | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
| Also referred to as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
| Category | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
| Released | 2005-01-10 | 2015-04-13 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Number of lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 1.8" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 134k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 624 gr (1.38 lbs) | 247 gr (0.54 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 380 shots |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $800 | $379 |