Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VG-145

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Olympus VG-145 front
Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
24
Overall
31

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VG-145 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Launched January 2005
  • Additionally Known as EVOLT E-300
  • New Model is Olympus E-330
Olympus VG-145
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Introduced July 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VG-145 Overview

Lets look more closely at the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VG-145, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Ultracompact and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and VG-145 (14MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and VG-145 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor measurements.

Photography Glossary

The E-300 was revealed 7 years before the VG-145 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus VG-145 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before getting through a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise summation of how the E-300 grades vs the VG-145 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus VG-145

 E-300 VG-145 
Focus manually More exact focus

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Olympus E-300

 VG-145 E-300 
IntroducedJuly 2011January 2005Newer by 79 months
Screen sizing3"1.8"Bigger screen (+1.2")
Screen resolution230k134kCrisper screen (+96k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus VG-145

 E-300 VG-145 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch screen Lack of Touch screen

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VG-145 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 comes with outer measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") having a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-145 has dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VG-145 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are using at that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the E-300 against the VG-145.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VG-145 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and VG-145 is 67 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VG-145 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VG-145 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be tough to envision the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reading through technical specs. The picture underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and VG-145.

As you can tell, both of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-300 with its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Olympus VG-145 will resolve more detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots a little more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VG-145 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VG-145 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VG-145 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 Portrait photography features
Olympus VG-145 Portrait photography features
48
focusing manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
doesn't have liveview
MP count low (8MP)
33
decent MP (14 megapixels)
provides face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-300
Street photography with Olympus VG-145
51
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
48
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus VG-145 as a Sports photography camera
37
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect autofocus
doesn't have liveview
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (8 megapixels)
26
decent MP (14MP)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
bad battery life (160 shots)
no phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography advice
Olympus VG-145 Travel photography advice
45
built-in flash
lack of Timelapse mode
MP count low (8MP)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
62
decent MP (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
rather wide (26mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
bad battery life (160 per charge)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography details
Olympus VG-145 Landscape photography details
43
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
small screen (1.8")
doesn't have liveview
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (8MP)
low maximum ISO (400)
lack of Timelapse mode
36
rather wide (26mm)
decent sized screen (3")
decent MP (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
lack of manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
bad battery life (160 per charge)
does not have Time Lapse function
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging info
Olympus VG-145 Vlogging info
9
no video recording
28
rather wide (26mm)
provides face detection focus
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external mic socket
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VG-145 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Olympus VG-145
 Olympus E-300Olympus VG-145
General Information
Make Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-300 Olympus VG-145
Also Known as EVOLT E-300 -
Type Advanced DSLR Ultracompact
Launched 2005-01-10 2011-07-27
Physical type Mid-size SLR Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Highest Possible resolution 3264 x 2448 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 400 1600
Maximum enhanced ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 3 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 26-130mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.8-6.5
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 1.8" 3"
Resolution of screen 134 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 4s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate 3.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - 4.40 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1280x720
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624 gr (1.38 lb) 120 gr (0.26 lb)
Dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 160 images
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery ID - LI-70B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC
Card slots 1 1
Price at release $800 $0