Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VG-160
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Launched January 2005
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-300
- Refreshed by Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2012
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VG-160, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are built by Olympus. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and VG-160 (14MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and VG-160 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-300 was revealed 8 years prior to the VG-160 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a in depth comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the E-300 scores against the VG-160 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-300 & Olympus VG-160. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus VG-160
E-300 | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Olympus E-300
VG-160 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2012 | January 2005 | More recent by 85 months | |
Display dimension | 3" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
Display resolution | 230k | 134k | Clearer display (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus VG-160
E-300 | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-300 has external dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Olympus VG-160 has proportions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VG-160 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at that moment. Here is the front view size comparison of the E-300 against the VG-160.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and VG-160 is 67 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to see the gap between sensor measurements merely by going over a spec sheet. The graphic underneath should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and VG-160.
Clearly, both cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-300 with its larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus VG-160 will offer you greater detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Olympus VG-160 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-300 | Olympus VG-160 |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2005-01-10 | 2012-01-10 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
Max enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 7cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 1.8 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 134 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 624g (1.38 lbs) | 125g (0.28 lbs) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 165 pictures |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $800 | $90 |