Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VG-160

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Olympus VG-160 front
Portability
96
Imaging
38
Features
26
Overall
33

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Launched January 2005
  • Alternative Name is EVOLT E-300
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-330
Olympus VG-160
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Introduced January 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview

Lets look a little more closely at the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VG-160, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are built by Olympus. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and VG-160 (14MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and VG-160 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizing.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-300 was revealed 8 years prior to the VG-160 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera.

Before delving through a in depth comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the E-300 scores against the VG-160 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus VG-160

 E-300 VG-160 
Manual focus More precise focus

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Olympus E-300

 VG-160 E-300 
IntroducedJanuary 2012January 2005More recent by 85 months
Display dimension3"1.8"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution230k134kClearer display (+96k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus VG-160

 E-300 VG-160 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly display Absent Touch friendly display

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-300 has external dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Olympus VG-160 has proportions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VG-160 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at that moment. Here is the front view size comparison of the E-300 against the VG-160.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VG-160 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and VG-160 is 67 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VG-160 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is hard to see the gap between sensor measurements merely by going over a spec sheet. The graphic underneath should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and VG-160.

Clearly, both cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-300 with its larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus VG-160 will offer you greater detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VG-160 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 Portrait photography factors
Olympus VG-160 Portrait photography factors
48
has manual focus
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
does not have liveview
low resolution (8MP)
34
megapixel count decent (14MP)
features face detect autofocus
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
no external flash support
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-300
Street photography with Olympus VG-160
51
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
no moving screen
no image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
56
lighter than competitors in class (125g)
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus VG-160 as a Sports photography camera
37
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect AF
does not have liveview
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
low resolution (8 megapixels)
27
megapixel count decent (14MP)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
low battery life (165 shots)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography factors
Olympus VG-160 Travel photography factors
45
built-in flash
does not have Time Lapse function
low resolution (8MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
66
lighter than competitors in class (125g)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
pretty wide (26mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
low battery life (165 CIPA)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus VG-160 as a Landscape photography camera
43
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
tiny screen (1.8 inches)
does not have liveview
no image stabilization
low resolution (8MP)
low max ISO (400)
does not have Time Lapse function
37
pretty wide (26mm)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
low battery life (165 CIPA)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-300
Vlogging with Olympus VG-160
9
no video recording
30
pretty wide (26mm)
features face detect autofocus
lighter than competitors in class (125g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have mic jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Olympus VG-160
 Olympus E-300Olympus VG-160
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-300 Olympus VG-160
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-300 -
Type Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2005-01-10 2012-01-10
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Max resolution 3264 x 2448 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 400 1600
Max enhanced ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 3 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 26-130mm (5.0x)
Max aperture - f/2.8-6.5
Macro focusing range - 7cm
Total lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 1.8 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 134 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 4.80 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624g (1.38 lbs) 125g (0.28 lbs)
Dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 165 pictures
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery ID - LI-70B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC
Storage slots 1 1
Price at release $800 $90