Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VH-410
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bac5b/bac5bbb1b3188a701eb58c897a8f12a9e6261c17" alt="Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59f27/59f2779b461c5c1f48d75ee4336ab725697c7831" alt="Olympus VH-410 front Olympus VH-410 front"
95 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VH-410 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Announced January 2005
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-300
- Successor is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Revealed August 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VH-410 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-300 and Olympus VH-410, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both are designed by Olympus. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and VH-410 (16MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and VH-410 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-300 was unveiled 8 years before the VH-410 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus VH-410 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a complete comparison, here is a quick summation of how the E-300 grades vs the VH-410 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VH-410 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-300 & Olympus VH-410. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Olympus VH-410 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus VH-410
E-300 | VH-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-410 over the Olympus E-300
VH-410 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2012 | ![]() | January 2005 | More recent by 92 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 134k | Clearer screen (+326k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus VH-410
E-300 | VH-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VH-410 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-300 provides exterior dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Olympus VH-410 has proportions of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
See the Olympus E-300 and Olympus VH-410 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select at that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-300 versus the VH-410.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45358/4535899d013bd44463cbf752e5f483a31d66971d" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VH-410 size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VH-410 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and VH-410 is 67 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e752/8e752decc35cca8f26fd3c0821053f4b8648ce38" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VH-410 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VH-410 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VH-410 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements only by reviewing a spec sheet. The visual underneath might give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and VH-410.
Clearly, each of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-300 using its bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus VH-410 will deliver greater detail having an extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66b07/66b07dc08be031363cac24e163c747b9ae4542f6" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VH-410 sensor size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VH-410 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52e21/52e21765186335cb82bfd85de061d3b03d4d58e9" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VH-410 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Olympus VH-410 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-300 | Olympus VH-410 |
Alternate name | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2005-01-10 | 2012-08-21 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 1.8 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 134 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.70 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 624g (1.38 lb) | 152g (0.34 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $800 | $186 |