Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VH-515
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bac5b/bac5bbb1b3188a701eb58c897a8f12a9e6261c17" alt="Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77ce5/77ce56bcec511e7aab885ff155154eb3bca39025" alt="Olympus VH-515 front Olympus VH-515 front"
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VH-515 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Released January 2005
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-300
- New Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced August 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VH-515 Overview
The following is a in depth analysis of the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VH-515, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both are designed by Olympus. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and VH-515 (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and VH-515 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-300 was introduced 8 years before the VH-515 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus VH-515 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the E-300 matches up versus the VH-515 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VH-515 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-300 & Olympus VH-515. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Olympus VH-515 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus VH-515
E-300 | VH-515 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-515 over the Olympus E-300
VH-515 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2012 | ![]() | January 2005 | Newer by 92 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 134k | Sharper screen (+326k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus VH-515
E-300 | VH-515 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VH-515 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera, you should take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 has got external measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") having a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Olympus VH-515 has specifications of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VH-515 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at that moment. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the E-300 vs the VH-515.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8234d/8234de0be31c34fe60f74bb4bd5066e2325900ab" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VH-515 size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VH-515 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and VH-515 is 67 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8de82/8de82a3d84bd327f146a9eb56dda35996ddf2f70" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VH-515 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VH-515 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VH-515 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions just by checking technical specs. The picture below may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and VH-515.
As you have seen, both cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-300 using its bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus VH-515 will resolve more detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/993af/993af6ba0492b2e328f114093f2ae1343aad2f4e" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VH-515 sensor size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VH-515 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VH-515 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6ee79/6ee7957b7461facd1f65437c06de19499cbcf39a" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VH-515 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VH-515 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VH-515 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Olympus VH-515 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Olympus VH-515 |
Also Known as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2005-01-10 | 2012-08-21 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 1.8 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 134k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624 grams (1.38 lb) | 152 grams (0.34 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $800 | $648 |