Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VH-515

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Olympus VH-515 front
Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
34
Overall
35

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VH-515 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Released January 2005
  • Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-300
  • New Model is Olympus E-330
Olympus VH-515
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
  • Introduced August 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VH-515 Overview

The following is a in depth analysis of the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VH-515, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both are designed by Olympus. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and VH-515 (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and VH-515 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor measurements.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-300 was introduced 8 years before the VH-515 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus VH-515 being a Compact camera.

Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the E-300 matches up versus the VH-515 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus VH-515

 E-300 VH-515 
Focus manually Dial precise focus

Reasons to pick Olympus VH-515 over the Olympus E-300

 VH-515 E-300 
IntroducedAugust 2012January 2005Newer by 92 months
Screen dimensions3"1.8"Bigger screen (+1.2")
Screen resolution460k134kSharper screen (+326k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus VH-515

 E-300 VH-515 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VH-515 Physical Comparison

In case you're going to travel with your camera, you should take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 has got external measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") having a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Olympus VH-515 has specifications of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VH-515 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at that moment. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the E-300 vs the VH-515.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VH-515 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and VH-515 is 67 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VH-515 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VH-515 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very hard to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions just by checking technical specs. The picture below may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and VH-515.

As you have seen, both cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-300 using its bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus VH-515 will resolve more detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VH-515 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VH-515 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VH-515 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 Portrait photography advice
Olympus VH-515 Portrait photography advice
48
has manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
no liveview feature
MP count low (8 megapixels)
27
offers face detect autofocus
no manual focus
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
MP count low (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography info
Olympus VH-515 Street photography info
51
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides focus by touch
fixed screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography info
Olympus VH-515 Sports photography info
37
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect auto focus
no liveview feature
max frames per second low (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (8MP)
32
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers tracking focus
max fps very slow (2.0 fps)
no shutter priority
MP count low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography information
Olympus VH-515 Travel photography information
45
has built in flash
does not have Time Lapse recording
MP count low (8 megapixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
62
provides focus by touch
built-in flash
pretty wide (26mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
MP count low (12MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography details
Olympus VH-515 Landscape photography details
43
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
screen is somewhat small (1.8 inches)
no liveview feature
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (8 megapixels)
max ISO too low (400)
does not have Time Lapse recording
37
pretty wide (26mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
lack of manual mode
MP count low (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging highlights
Olympus VH-515 Vlogging highlights
9
can't record video
35
pretty wide (26mm)
touch screen
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
doesn't have microphone support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VH-515 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Olympus VH-515
 Olympus E-300Olympus VH-515
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-300 Olympus VH-515
Also Known as EVOLT E-300 -
Type Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Released 2005-01-10 2012-08-21
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic III+
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3264 x 2448 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 400 1600
Maximum boosted ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 26-130mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.8-6.5
Macro focus range - 5cm
Total lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 1.8 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 134k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 4.70 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 624 grams (1.38 lb) 152 grams (0.34 lb)
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Launch pricing $800 $648