Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-340

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Olympus VR-340 front
Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Released January 2005
  • Also referred to as EVOLT E-300
  • Later Model is Olympus E-330
Olympus VR-340
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Announced January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-340 Overview

The following is a in-depth assessment of the Olympus E-300 and Olympus VR-340, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both are produced by Olympus. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and VR-340 (16MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and VR-340 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizes.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-300 was introduced 8 years prior to the VR-340 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus VR-340 being a Compact camera.

Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the E-300 scores against the VR-340 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus VR-340

 E-300 VR-340 
Manual focus More accurate focus

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Olympus E-300

 VR-340 E-300 
AnnouncedJanuary 2012January 2005Newer by 85 months
Screen size3"1.8"Bigger screen (+1.2")
Screen resolution460k134kCrisper screen (+326k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus VR-340

 E-300 VR-340 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lack of Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-300 enjoys exterior dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Olympus VR-340 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-300 and Olympus VR-340 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at the time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the E-300 against the VR-340.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-340 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and VR-340 is 67 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-340 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it's tough to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions only by reading through a spec sheet. The picture here will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and VR-340.

Clearly, both cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-300 having a bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus VR-340 will give more detail using its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-340 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 Portrait photography information
Olympus VR-340 Portrait photography information
48
focusing manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
no liveview
low MP (8MP)
34
MP count good (16 megapixels)
supports face detection focus
no manual focus
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography advice
Olympus VR-340 Street photography advice
51
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
63
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (125g)
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography factors
Olympus VR-340 Sports photography factors
37
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect autofocus
no liveview
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
low MP (8 megapixels)
44
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16MP)
supports tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-300
Travel photography with Olympus VR-340
45
built-in flash
does not have Time Lapse function
low MP (8 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly display
69
lighter than competition (125g)
MP count good (16MP)
built-in flash
decently wide (24mm)
missing Time Lapse function
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography details
Olympus VR-340 Landscape photography details
43
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
screen is somewhat small (1.8 inches)
no liveview
does not have image stabilization
low MP (8MP)
max ISO too low (400)
does not have Time Lapse function
43
decently wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16MP)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
manual mode not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
missing Time Lapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus VR-340 as a Vlogging camera
9
can't shoot video
33
decently wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focus
lighter than competition (125 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external mic port
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Olympus VR-340
 Olympus E-300Olympus VR-340
General Information
Make Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-300 Olympus VR-340
Other name EVOLT E-300 -
Category Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Released 2005-01-10 2012-01-10
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3264 x 2448 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 400 3200
Highest enhanced ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 3 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-240mm (10.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.0-5.7
Amount of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 1.8 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 134k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 4.80 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1280x720
Video format - Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 624g (1.38 lbs) 125g (0.28 lbs)
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Retail pricing $800 $130