Olympus E-300 vs Olympus XZ-1
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Launched January 2005
- Other Name is EVOLT E-300
- Replacement is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Released January 2011
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
In this write-up, we are contrasting the Olympus E-300 and Olympus XZ-1, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both built by Olympus. The resolution of the E-300 (8MP) and the XZ-1 (10MP) is very similar but the E-300 (Four Thirds) and XZ-1 (1/1.63") possess different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-300 was announced 7 years earlier than the XZ-1 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the E-300 matches up vs the XZ-1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-300 & Olympus XZ-1. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus XZ-1
E-300 | XZ-1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Olympus E-300
XZ-1 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2011 | January 2005 | More recent by 73 months | |
Display sizing | 3" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
Display resolution | 614k | 134k | Crisper display (+480k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus XZ-1
E-300 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-300 provides exterior measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-1 has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") along with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-300 and Olympus XZ-1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at the time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the E-300 compared to the XZ-1.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and XZ-1 is 67 and 88 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements purely by going over specifications. The graphic below will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and XZ-1.
To sum up, each of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-300 having a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus XZ-1 will deliver extra detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a little more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Olympus XZ-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Olympus XZ-1 |
Alternative name | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2005-01-10 | 2011-01-26 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic V |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.63" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 44.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3664 x 2752 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 1.8 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 134k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | - | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624 gr (1.38 pounds) | 275 gr (0.61 pounds) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 34 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 18.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 117 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 photographs |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $800 | $567 |