Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS200
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
86 Imaging
53 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Announced January 2005
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-300
- Renewed by Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DC-TZ200
- Previous Model is Panasonic ZS100
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
The following is a thorough review of the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic ZS200, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and ZS200 (20MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and ZS200 (1") possess totally different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-300 was launched 14 years before the ZS200 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going straight into a full comparison, below is a concise overview of how the E-300 scores vs the ZS200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-300 & Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic ZS200
E-300 | ZS200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus E-300
ZS200 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2018 | January 2005 | Newer by 159 months | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") | |
Screen resolution | 1240k | 134k | Clearer screen (+1106k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic ZS200
E-300 | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-300 features physical measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS200 has proportions of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") and a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic ZS200 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at the time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the E-300 versus the ZS200.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and ZS200 is 67 and 86 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reading specifications. The pic here will provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and ZS200.
Plainly, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-300 featuring a bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Panasonic ZS200 will deliver greater detail utilizing its extra 12MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-300 | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2005-01-10 | 2018-02-13 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | MOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 1.8 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 134k dot | 1,240k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Max video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624g (1.38 pounds) | 340g (0.75 pounds) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 370 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $800 | $800 |