Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS200

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 front
Portability
86
Imaging
54
Features
66
Overall
58

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Announced January 2005
  • Alternative Name is EVOLT E-300
  • Renewed by Olympus E-330
Panasonic ZS200
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
  • 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
  • Introduced February 2018
  • Additionally referred to as Lumix DC-TZ200
  • Previous Model is Panasonic ZS100
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview

The following is a thorough review of the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic ZS200, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and ZS200 (20MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and ZS200 (1") possess totally different sensor sizes.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-300 was launched 14 years before the ZS200 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before going straight into a full comparison, below is a concise overview of how the E-300 scores vs the ZS200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic ZS200

 E-300 ZS200 

Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus E-300

 ZS200 E-300 
IntroducedFebruary 2018January 2005Newer by 159 months
Screen sizing3"1.8"Bigger screen (+1.2")
Screen resolution1240k134kClearer screen (+1106k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic ZS200

 E-300 ZS200 
Manually focus Very precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison

When you are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-300 features physical measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS200 has proportions of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") and a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic ZS200 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at the time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the E-300 versus the ZS200.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS200 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and ZS200 is 67 and 86 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS200 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is very hard to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reading specifications. The pic here will provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and ZS200.

Plainly, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-300 featuring a bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Panasonic ZS200 will deliver greater detail utilizing its extra 12MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS200 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Portrait photography camera
Panasonic ZS200 as a Portrait photography camera
48
focusing manually
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
does not have liveview
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
65
manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
sensor size is good (1")
includes face detection autofocus
delivers RAW files
external flash not possible
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography information
Panasonic ZS200 Street photography information
51
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
77
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is good (1")
delivers RAW files
comes with focus by touch
screen is fixed
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography info
Panasonic ZS200 Sports photography info
37
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect auto focus
does not have liveview
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (8MP)
70
great zoom range (24-360mm 15.0 x zoom)
silent shutter (1/16,000s)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
sensor size is good (1")
includes tracking autofocus
better than average battery life (370 per charge)
lack of phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography details
Panasonic ZS200 Travel photography details
45
has built in flash
no Time Lapse function
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
76
better than average battery life (370 CIPA)
supports bluetooth
comes with focus by touch
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (24mm)
very long zoom (360mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography details
Panasonic ZS200 Landscape photography details
43
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
screen is somewhat small (1.8 inch)
does not have liveview
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (8MP)
low max ISO (400)
no Time Lapse function
70
manual focus
pretty wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (1")
delivers RAW files
better than average battery life (370 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging factors
Panasonic ZS200 Vlogging factors
9
no video
35
pretty wide (24mm)
touchscreen enabled
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection autofocus
high res video (3840 x 2160 resolution)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
screen isn't selfie friendly
missing external microphone jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Panasonic ZS200
 Olympus E-300Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus E-300 Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-300 Lumix DC-TZ200
Type Advanced DSLR Large Sensor Compact
Announced 2005-01-10 2018-02-13
Body design Mid-size SLR Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - Venus Engine
Sensor type CCD MOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3264 x 2448 5472 x 3648
Max native ISO 400 12800
Max enhanced ISO 1600 25600
Minimum native ISO 100 125
RAW photos
Minimum enhanced ISO - 80
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 3 49
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-360mm (15.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.3-6.4
Macro focus range - 5cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 2.7
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 1.8 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 134k dot 1,240k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,330k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.53x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Fastest silent shutter speed - 1/16000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames per second 10.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 6.80 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Max video resolution None 3840x2160
Video format - MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) Yes
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 624g (1.38 pounds) 340g (0.75 pounds)
Dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 370 photos
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible)
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $800 $800