Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP2
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
95 Imaging
36 Features
17 Overall
28
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Introduced January 2005
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-300
- New Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 151g - 99 x 59 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP2 Overview
Below is a extensive comparison of the Olympus E-300 versus Panasonic FP2, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and FP2 (14MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and FP2 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-300 was unveiled 6 years prior to the FP2 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FP2 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the E-300 matches up versus the FP2 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP2 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-300 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Panasonic FP2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic FP2
| E-300 | FP2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FP2 over the Olympus E-300
| FP2 | E-300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2010 | January 2005 | More recent by 60 months | |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.9") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 134k | Sharper display (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FP2
| E-300 | FP2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP2 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-300 provides physical measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FP2 has measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-300 versus Panasonic FP2 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-300 vs the FP2.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and FP2 is 67 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP2 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to visualize the gap in sensor measurements purely by researching specs. The visual here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and FP2.
All in all, each of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-300 with its larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh less difficult and the Panasonic FP2 will result in greater detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older E-300 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP2 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP2 Specifications
| Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 |
| Also Known as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
| Type | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2005-01-10 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 10cm |
| Total lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 1.8 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 134k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.90 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 624g (1.38 lbs) | 151g (0.33 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 99 x 59 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $800 | $80 |