Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP2

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 front
Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
17
Overall
29

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP2 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Introduced January 2005
  • Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-300
  • New Model is Olympus E-330
Panasonic FP2
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 151g - 99 x 59 x 19mm
  • Introduced January 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP2 Overview

Below is a extensive comparison of the Olympus E-300 versus Panasonic FP2, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and FP2 (14MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and FP2 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizes.

YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segments

The E-300 was unveiled 6 years prior to the FP2 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FP2 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the E-300 matches up versus the FP2 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic FP2

 E-300 FP2 
Manually focus More accurate focus

Reasons to pick Panasonic FP2 over the Olympus E-300

 FP2 E-300 
IntroducedJanuary 2010January 2005More recent by 60 months
Display dimensions2.7"1.8"Larger display (+0.9")
Display resolution230k134kSharper display (+96k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FP2

 E-300 FP2 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither provides Touch friendly display

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP2 Physical Comparison

When you are planning to lug around your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-300 provides physical measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FP2 has measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-300 versus Panasonic FP2 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-300 vs the FP2.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP2 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and FP2 is 67 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP2 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP2 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be difficult to visualize the gap in sensor measurements purely by researching specs. The visual here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and FP2.

All in all, each of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-300 with its larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh less difficult and the Panasonic FP2 will result in greater detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older E-300 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP2 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP2 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Portrait photography camera
Panasonic FP2 as a Portrait photography camera
48
has manual focus
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
no liveview feature
low resolution sensor (8MP)
28
good megapixels (14MP)
manual focus not available
no manual control
cannot use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography highlights
Panasonic FP2 Street photography highlights
51
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
fixed screen
no image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
55
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
heavier than competition in class (151 grams)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography information
Panasonic FP2 Sports photography information
37
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect autofocus
no liveview feature
slow frames per second (3.0 fps)
no image stabilization
low resolution sensor (8MP)
35
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (14MP)
slow fps (5.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Supernova astonishes astronomers in ancient 12th century observations

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Travel photography camera
Panasonic FP2 as a Travel photography camera
45
flash built-in
missing Time Lapse function
low resolution sensor (8 megapixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
56
good megapixels (14MP)
flash built-in
lack of Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition in class (151g)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography factors
Panasonic FP2 Landscape photography factors
43
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (1.8 inches)
no liveview feature
no image stabilization
low resolution sensor (8 megapixels)
low maximum ISO (400)
missing Time Lapse function
33
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
small screen (2.7 inch)
no manual control
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
lack of Time Lapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging advice
Panasonic FP2 Vlogging advice
9
no video
25
built in image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not great (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of mic support
heavier than competition in class (151 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FP2
 Olympus E-300Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2
General Information
Company Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus E-300 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2
Also Known as EVOLT E-300 -
Type Advanced DSLR Ultracompact
Introduced 2005-01-10 2010-01-06
Physical type Mid-size SLR Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Venus Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3264 x 2448 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 400 6400
Maximum enhanced ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 35-140mm (4.0x)
Largest aperture - f/3.5-5.9
Macro focus distance - 10cm
Total lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 1.8 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of display 134k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 60s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1600s
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames/s 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 4.90 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1280x720
Video format - Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 624g (1.38 lbs) 151g (0.33 lbs)
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 99 x 59 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots One One
Pricing at release $800 $80