Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP2
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
95 Imaging
36 Features
17 Overall
28
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Introduced January 2005
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-300
- New Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 151g - 99 x 59 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP2 Overview
Below is a extensive comparison of the Olympus E-300 versus Panasonic FP2, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and FP2 (14MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and FP2 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-300 was unveiled 6 years prior to the FP2 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FP2 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the E-300 matches up versus the FP2 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP2 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-300 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Panasonic FP2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic FP2
| E-300 | FP2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FP2 over the Olympus E-300
| FP2 | E-300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2010 | January 2005 | More recent by 60 months | |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.9") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 134k | Sharper display (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FP2
| E-300 | FP2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP2 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-300 provides physical measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FP2 has measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-300 versus Panasonic FP2 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-300 vs the FP2.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and FP2 is 67 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP2 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to visualize the gap in sensor measurements purely by researching specs. The visual here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and FP2.
All in all, each of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-300 with its larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh less difficult and the Panasonic FP2 will result in greater detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older E-300 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP2 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP2 Specifications
| Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 |
| Also Known as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
| Type | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2005-01-10 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 10cm |
| Total lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 1.8 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 134k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.90 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 624g (1.38 lbs) | 151g (0.33 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 99 x 59 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $800 | $80 |