Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP8
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bac5b/bac5bbb1b3188a701eb58c897a8f12a9e6261c17" alt="Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10548/105481727825cb9cec94d025b6a727750d258e12" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8 front"
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP8 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Revealed January 2005
- Also referred to as EVOLT E-300
- Renewed by Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-128mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 151g - 96 x 60 x 20mm
- Announced July 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP8 Overview
Here is a extended comparison of the Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP8, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and FP8 (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and FP8 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-300 was announced 5 years earlier than the FP8 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FP8 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the E-300 scores against the FP8 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP8 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-300 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Panasonic FP8 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic FP8
E-300 | FP8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FP8 over the Olympus E-300
FP8 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2009 | ![]() | January 2005 | Fresher by 55 months |
Display dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.9") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 134k | Crisper display (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FP8
E-300 | FP8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Missing Touch display |
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP8 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-300 provides physical measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Panasonic FP8 has sizing of 96mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP8 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the E-300 versus the FP8.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52bf6/52bf699d35d925efe2e3ce5c4feeea8719f39315" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP8 size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP8 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and FP8 is 67 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf334/bf33476c84893f73f2d9a6b89a4a1a105af208d4" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP8 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP8 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP8 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizing just by reading through specifications. The visual underneath may give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and FP8.
Plainly, each of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-300 with its larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic FP8 will give you more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d46cc/d46cc4da13100e1ba0a3a9c2cbc50960a9bf3bf3" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP8 sensor size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP8 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP8 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ef05b/ef05b231d9fc72862e6d0a06ca23d2067730fc23" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP8 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP8 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP8 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8 |
Also called | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2005-01-10 | 2009-07-27 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Venus Engine V |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-128mm (4.6x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 1.8 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 134k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1300 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624 grams (1.38 lbs) | 151 grams (0.33 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 96 x 60 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $800 | $300 |