Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FS12
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
95 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FS12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Launched January 2005
- Also Known as EVOLT E-300
- New Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-124mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 129g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Released April 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FS12 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FS12, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and FS12 (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and FS12 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe E-300 was unveiled 5 years earlier than the FS12 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FS12 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight to a in depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the E-300 grades versus the FS12 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FS12 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-300 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Panasonic FS12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic FS12
| E-300 | FS12 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More precise focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS12 over the Olympus E-300
| FS12 | E-300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | April 2009 | January 2005 | More recent by 51 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+0.9") | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 134k | Crisper screen (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FS12
| E-300 | FS12 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FS12 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-300 comes with physical dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Panasonic FS12 has proportions of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FS12 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-300 vs the FS12.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and FS12 is 67 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FS12 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to see the gap between sensor measurements only by reading technical specs. The visual here might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and FS12.
As you can tell, both cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-300 with its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Panasonic FS12 will offer extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FS12 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FS12 Specifications
| Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 |
| Also called as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
| Category | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2005-01-10 | 2009-04-17 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 31-124mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Available lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 1.8 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 134k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 6.30 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 640x480 |
| Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 624 grams (1.38 pounds) | 129 grams (0.28 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $800 | $228 |