Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FS25
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bac5b/bac5bbb1b3188a701eb58c897a8f12a9e6261c17" alt="Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47619/47619e6b1ac91a51a7449bd9802860c5373c0a46" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 front"
95 Imaging
34 Features
24 Overall
30
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FS25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Launched January 2005
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-300
- Replacement is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 29-145mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 148g - 97 x 58 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FS25 Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Olympus E-300 versus Panasonic FS25, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and FS25 (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and FS25 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-300 was unveiled 5 years before the FS25 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FS25 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-300 scores vs the FS25 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FS25 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-300 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Panasonic FS25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic FS25
E-300 | FS25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS25 over the Olympus E-300
FS25 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2009 | ![]() | January 2005 | More modern by 49 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 134k | Crisper display (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FS25
E-300 | FS25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FS25 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-300 has got external measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") having a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Panasonic FS25 has measurements of 97mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 148 grams (0.33 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-300 versus Panasonic FS25 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the E-300 against the FS25.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4dfc7/4dfc7817885279266b682cbb0486c1e2d3583f4f" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FS25 size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FS25 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and FS25 is 67 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ed65/2ed6559b48d93f83dfbb26a3d111f3cbb11e7673" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FS25 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FS25 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FS25 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to envision the difference in sensor sizes simply by viewing technical specs. The picture below should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and FS25.
As you can tell, each of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-300 having a larger sensor will make shooting bokeh easier and the Panasonic FS25 will render greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos much more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f026/0f026201200982fb1e7a831756f95b524502c734" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FS25 sensor size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FS25 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FS25 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a640/6a640dbf11c43474fab6f6c88d73aff21173f8dd" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FS25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FS25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FS25 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 |
Also called as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2005-01-10 | 2009-01-27 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 29-145mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 1.8 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 134k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.30 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624 gr (1.38 pounds) | 148 gr (0.33 pounds) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 97 x 58 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $800 | $230 |