Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FS42
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
95 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Launched January 2005
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-300
- Replacement is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000 (Raise to 6400)
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
- Revealed April 2009
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FS42 Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FS42, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the E-300 (8MP) and the FS42 (10MP) is pretty comparable but the E-300 (Four Thirds) and FS42 (1/2.5") come with different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-300 was unveiled 5 years earlier than the FS42 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the E-300 grades versus the FS42 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FS42 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-300 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Panasonic FS42 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic FS42
E-300 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Olympus E-300
FS42 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | April 2009 | January 2005 | Newer by 51 months | |
Screen dimension | 2.5" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+0.7") | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 134k | Clearer screen (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FS42
E-300 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FS42 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera, you should think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 has outer dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") having a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Panasonic FS42 has specifications of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FS42 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using during that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-300 vs the FS42.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and FS42 is 67 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FS42 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions simply by going through a spec sheet. The image here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and FS42.
As you can see, both of those cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-300 having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Panasonic FS42 will produce greater detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 |
Also referred to as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2005-01-10 | 2009-04-17 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.5" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 1000 |
Max boosted ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 1.8 inch | 2.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 134k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 6.30 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624g (1.38 lbs) | 132g (0.29 lbs) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $800 | $580 |