Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX48
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bac5b/bac5bbb1b3188a701eb58c897a8f12a9e6261c17" alt="Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a7a1/8a7a180937ea0d2aac292604a641c6ce9f80a13b" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 front"
95 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX48 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Revealed January 2005
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-300
- Successor is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 25-125mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 150g - 95 x 53 x 22mm
- Announced January 2009
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FX40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX48 Overview
In this article, we are analyzing the Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX48, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and FX48 (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and FX48 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-300 was introduced 5 years before the FX48 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FX48 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a brief summation of how the E-300 scores vs the FX48 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX48 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-300 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Panasonic FX48 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic FX48
E-300 | FX48 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX48 over the Olympus E-300
FX48 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2009 | ![]() | January 2005 | Fresher by 49 months |
Display sizing | 2.5" | ![]() | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.7") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 134k | Crisper display (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FX48
E-300 | FX48 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | No Touch display |
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX48 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-300 comes with external dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Panasonic FX48 has proportions of 95mm x 53mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX48 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the E-300 versus the FX48.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6698e/6698e1389521d839d63f9c00895bbd9f4591cd85" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX48 size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX48 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and FX48 is 67 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5436/c5436260b19807a0e94a8e04fc846ceff2d0dbbe" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX48 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX48 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX48 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing only by looking through technical specs. The visual below should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and FX48.
As you can tell, both cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-300 having a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Panasonic FX48 will result in more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos far more aggressively. The older E-300 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9706b/9706beae3b7dcc4f7b10948db513e47302d2066f" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX48 sensor size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX48 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX48 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ee86/2ee86668133f2b3fff1bd26a63c8cd0aa72dde43" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX48 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX48 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX48 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 |
Also referred to as | EVOLT E-300 | Lumix DMC-FX40 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2005-01-10 | 2009-01-27 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 1.8" | 2.5" |
Resolution of screen | 134k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/3000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 6.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624g (1.38 lb) | 150g (0.33 lb) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 95 x 53 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $800 | $325 |