Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX75
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bac5b/bac5bbb1b3188a701eb58c897a8f12a9e6261c17" alt="Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a220c/a220c2e13d4b7304cd494deb3786cbaa31bcfeb7" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Revealed January 2005
- Other Name is EVOLT E-300
- New Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Released June 2010
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FX70
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX75 Overview
Lets look closer at the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FX75, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and FX75 (14MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and FX75 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-300 was revealed 6 years before the FX75 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FX75 being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a thorough comparison, here is a short overview of how the E-300 grades versus the FX75 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX75 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-300 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Panasonic FX75 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic FX75
E-300 | FX75 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Olympus E-300
FX75 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2010 | ![]() | January 2005 | More modern by 65 months |
Screen size | 2.7" | ![]() | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+0.9") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 134k | Sharper screen (+96k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FX75
E-300 | FX75 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera often, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-300 features outside measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Panasonic FX75 has proportions of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FX75 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at the time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the E-300 vs the FX75.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a991/3a991d10f8e1295076a5ab23eec64e64d5c793b7" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX75 size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX75 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and FX75 is 67 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0a4e4/0a4e4b3f3b15daba152fdb35d46bd87839280659" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX75 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX75 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes simply by checking out a spec sheet. The image below may give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and FX75.
As you can see, both of those cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-300 having a bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh simpler and the Panasonic FX75 will produce greater detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb322/fb3224390fab32221604f9556427f60acfbaef3a" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX75 sensor size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX75 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d8f6/2d8f6088ed03825c4c956d8e1124df731c7b58e3" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 |
Also called | EVOLT E-300 | Lumix DMC-FX70 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2005-01-10 | 2010-06-01 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine HD II |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.2-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 1.8" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 134k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 7.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 624g (1.38 lbs) | 165g (0.36 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $800 | $139 |