Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX75

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
32
Overall
35

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Revealed January 2005
  • Other Name is EVOLT E-300
  • New Model is Olympus E-330
Panasonic FX75
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
  • 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
  • Released June 2010
  • Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FX70
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX75 Overview

Lets look closer at the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FX75, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and FX75 (14MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and FX75 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor measurements.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-300 was revealed 6 years before the FX75 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FX75 being a Compact camera.

Before we go right into a thorough comparison, here is a short overview of how the E-300 grades versus the FX75 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic FX75

 E-300 FX75 
Focus manually Dial exact focus

Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Olympus E-300

 FX75 E-300 
ReleasedJune 2010January 2005More modern by 65 months
Screen size2.7"1.8"Bigger screen (+0.9")
Screen resolution230k134kSharper screen (+96k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FX75

 E-300 FX75 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to carry around your camera often, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-300 features outside measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Panasonic FX75 has proportions of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FX75 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at the time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the E-300 vs the FX75.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX75 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and FX75 is 67 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX75 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it's hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes simply by checking out a spec sheet. The image below may give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and FX75.

As you can see, both of those cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-300 having a bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh simpler and the Panasonic FX75 will produce greater detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX75 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 Portrait photography info
Panasonic FX75 Portrait photography info
48
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
sensor resolution low (8MP)
28
decent MP (14MP)
manual focus not available
no manual mode
can't use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-300
Street photography with Panasonic FX75
51
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
62
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with touch focus
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Sports photography camera
Panasonic FX75 as a Sports photography camera
37
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect auto focus
doesn't have liveview
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
39
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (14MP)
comes with tracking focus
slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-300
Travel photography with Panasonic FX75
45
has built in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
67
comes with touch focus
decent MP (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
rather wide (24mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f2.2)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-300
Landscape photography with Panasonic FX75
43
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
tiny screen (1.8 inches)
doesn't have liveview
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
low max ISO (400)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
37
rather wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.2)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
no manual mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging features
Panasonic FX75 Vlogging features
9
can't shoot video
31
rather wide (24mm)
touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
slow maximum aperture (f2.2)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have mic socket
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FX75
 Olympus E-300Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus E-300 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75
Also called EVOLT E-300 Lumix DMC-FX70
Class Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2005-01-10 2010-06-01
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Venus Engine HD II
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3264 x 2448 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 400 6400
Highest boosted ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-120mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.2-5.9
Macro focusing range - 3cm
Total lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 1.8" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 134k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - 7.40 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1280x720
Video format - AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624g (1.38 lbs) 165g (0.36 lbs)
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Launch price $800 $139