Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ200
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
65 Imaging
36 Features
64 Overall
47
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Launched January 2005
- Also referred to as EVOLT E-300
- New Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Introduced July 2012
- Older Model is Panasonic FZ100
- Later Model is Panasonic FZ300
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview
Here is a detailed comparison of the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FZ200, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and FZ200 (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and FZ200 (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-300 was unveiled 8 years prior to the FZ200 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the E-300 scores against the FZ200 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ200 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-300 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Panasonic FZ200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic FZ200
E-300 | FZ200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus E-300
FZ200 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2012 | January 2005 | Fresher by 91 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display size | 3" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 134k | Sharper display (+326k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FZ200
E-300 | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 enjoys exterior dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ200 has specifications of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") along with a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FZ200 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select during that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the E-300 compared to the FZ200.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and FZ200 is 67 and 65 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizing just by looking through technical specs. The visual below should provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and FZ200.
As you can tell, the two cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-300 with its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Panasonic FZ200 will result in greater detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older E-300 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 |
Also Known as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2005-01-10 | 2012-07-18 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine VII FHD |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 1.8 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 134k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,312k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 13.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624g (1.38 lbs) | 588g (1.30 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 37 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 19.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.8 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 114 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 540 images |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $800 | $499 |