Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ200

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 front
Portability
65
Imaging
36
Features
64
Overall
47

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Launched January 2005
  • Also referred to as EVOLT E-300
  • New Model is Olympus E-330
Panasonic FZ200
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
  • 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
  • Introduced July 2012
  • Older Model is Panasonic FZ100
  • Later Model is Panasonic FZ300
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview

Here is a detailed comparison of the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FZ200, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and FZ200 (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and FZ200 (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizing.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-300 was unveiled 8 years prior to the FZ200 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before diving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the E-300 scores against the FZ200 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic FZ200

 E-300 FZ200 

Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus E-300

 FZ200 E-300 
IntroducedJuly 2012January 2005Fresher by 91 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display size3"1.8"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution460k134kSharper display (+326k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FZ200

 E-300 FZ200 
Manual focus Dial accurate focus
Touch display Missing Touch display

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison

If you are intending to carry your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 enjoys exterior dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ200 has specifications of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") along with a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FZ200 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select during that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the E-300 compared to the FZ200.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ200 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and FZ200 is 67 and 65 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ200 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is very tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizing just by looking through technical specs. The visual below should provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and FZ200.

As you can tell, the two cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-300 with its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Panasonic FZ200 will result in greater detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older E-300 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ200 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 Portrait photography features
Panasonic FZ200 Portrait photography features
48
focusing manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
does not have liveview
low megapixels (8 megapixels)
48
manual focus
great flash sync speed (1/4,000s)
includes face detection focus
supports RAW files
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-300
Street photography with Panasonic FZ200
51
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
57
fully articulated screen
image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW files
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
heavier than competitors (588g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography highlights
Panasonic FZ200 Sports photography highlights
37
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
has phase detect autofocus
does not have liveview
max fps low (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
low megapixels (8MP)
46
great zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes tracking autofocus
great battery pack (540 CIPA)
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography advice
Panasonic FZ200 Travel photography advice
45
built-in flash
lack of Timelapse function
low megapixels (8 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
55
great battery pack (540 per charge)
flash built-in
selfie friendly screen
really wide (25mm)
very long zoom (600mm)
no Time Lapse recording
heavier than competitors (588g)
low MP (12MP)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography highlights
Panasonic FZ200 Landscape photography highlights
43
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (1.8")
does not have liveview
no image stabilization
low megapixels (8 megapixels)
low max ISO (400)
lack of Timelapse function
48
manual focus
really wide (25mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW files
great battery pack (540 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
low MP (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no Time Lapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging highlights
Panasonic FZ200 Vlogging highlights
9
no video
63
really wide (25mm)
selfie friendly screen
image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
comes with external mic jack
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
heavier than competitors (588 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FZ200
 Olympus E-300Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
General Information
Brand Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus E-300 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
Also Known as EVOLT E-300 -
Type Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2005-01-10 2012-07-18
Body design Mid-size SLR SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Chip - Venus Engine VII FHD
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3264 x 2448 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 400 3200
Maximum enhanced ISO 1600 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 3 23
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-600mm (24.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.8
Macro focus range - 1cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen sizing 1.8 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 134k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen technology - Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,312k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 3.0fps 12.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - 13.50 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash sync 1/180 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 624g (1.38 lbs) 588g (1.30 lbs)
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 37
DXO Color Depth score not tested 19.1
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 10.8
DXO Low light score not tested 114
Other
Battery life - 540 images
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Price at release $800 $499