Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ2500
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
53 Imaging
52 Features
81 Overall
63
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Revealed January 2005
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-300
- Successor is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FZ2000
- Older Model is Panasonic FZ1000
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Overview
Here is a detailed analysis of the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FZ2500, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and FZ2500 (20MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and FZ2500 (1") offer different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-300 was released 12 years prior to the FZ2500 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ2500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving into a full comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-300 matches up versus the FZ2500 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-300 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic FZ2500
| E-300 | FZ2500 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Olympus E-300
| FZ2500 | E-300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2016 | January 2005 | Fresher by 142 months | |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") | |
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 134k | Sharper screen (+906k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FZ2500
| E-300 | FZ2500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very accurate focusing |
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-300 has got outer dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ2500 has sizing of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") with a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FZ2500 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the E-300 compared to the FZ2500.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and FZ2500 is 67 and 53 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizing simply by going over technical specs. The photograph here will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and FZ2500.
As you have seen, each of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-300 because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Panasonic FZ2500 will deliver greater detail as a result of its extra 12 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Specifications
| Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 |
| Also called as | EVOLT E-300 | Lumix DMC-FZ2000 |
| Category | Advanced DSLR | Large Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2005-01-10 | 2016-09-19 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Maximum native ISO | 400 | 12800 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | - | 80 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 49 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-4.5 |
| Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
| Total lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display diagonal | 1.8 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 134k dots | 1,040k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Maximum quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 12.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 13.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 4096x2160 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 624 gr (1.38 lbs) | 915 gr (2.02 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 70 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 538 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 images |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | DMW-BLC12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $800 | $998 |