Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ2500
67 Imaging
40 Features
31 Overall
36
53 Imaging
52 Features
81 Overall
63
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Revealed January 2005
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-300
- Successor is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FZ2000
- Older Model is Panasonic FZ1000
Photography Glossary Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Overview
Here is a detailed analysis of the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FZ2500, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and FZ2500 (20MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and FZ2500 (1") offer different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-300 was released 12 years prior to the FZ2500 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ2500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving into a full comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-300 matches up versus the FZ2500 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-300 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic FZ2500
| E-300 | FZ2500 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Olympus E-300
| FZ2500 | E-300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2016 | January 2005 | Fresher by 142 months | |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") | |
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 134k | Sharper screen (+906k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FZ2500
| E-300 | FZ2500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very accurate focusing |
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-300 has got outer dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ2500 has sizing of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") with a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FZ2500 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the E-300 compared to the FZ2500.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and FZ2500 is 67 and 53 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizing simply by going over technical specs. The photograph here will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and FZ2500.
As you have seen, each of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-300 because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Panasonic FZ2500 will deliver greater detail as a result of its extra 12 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Specifications
| Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 |
| Also called as | EVOLT E-300 | Lumix DMC-FZ2000 |
| Category | Advanced DSLR | Large Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2005-01-10 | 2016-09-19 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Maximum native ISO | 400 | 12800 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | - | 80 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 49 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-4.5 |
| Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
| Total lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display diagonal | 1.8 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 134k dots | 1,040k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Maximum quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 12.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 13.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 4096x2160 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 624 gr (1.38 lbs) | 915 gr (2.02 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 70 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 538 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 images |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | DMW-BLC12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $800 | $998 |