Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ2500

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 front
Portability
53
Imaging
53
Features
81
Overall
64

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Revealed January 2005
  • Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-300
  • Successor is Olympus E-330
Panasonic FZ2500
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
  • 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
  • Revealed September 2016
  • Other Name is Lumix DMC-FZ2000
  • Older Model is Panasonic FZ1000
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Overview

Here is a detailed analysis of the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FZ2500, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and FZ2500 (20MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and FZ2500 (1") offer different sensor sizing.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-300 was released 12 years prior to the FZ2500 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ2500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before delving into a full comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-300 matches up versus the FZ2500 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic FZ2500

 E-300 FZ2500 

Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Olympus E-300

 FZ2500 E-300 
RevealedSeptember 2016January 2005Fresher by 142 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen size3"1.8"Bigger screen (+1.2")
Screen resolution1040k134kSharper screen (+906k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FZ2500

 E-300 FZ2500 
Manual focus Very accurate focusing

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to carry your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-300 has got outer dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ2500 has sizing of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") with a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FZ2500 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the E-300 compared to the FZ2500.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ2500 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and FZ2500 is 67 and 53 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ2500 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizing simply by going over technical specs. The photograph here will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and FZ2500.

As you have seen, each of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-300 because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Panasonic FZ2500 will deliver greater detail as a result of its extra 12 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be behind in sensor tech.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ2500 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-300
Portrait photography with Panasonic FZ2500
48
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
low resolution (8MP)
71
manual focus
megapixel count good (20MP)
sensor size is nice (1")
supports face detect focus
saves RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Street photography camera
Panasonic FZ2500 as a Street photography camera
51
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
70
fully articulated screen
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is nice (1")
saves RAW files
boasts touch to focus
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-300
Sports photography with Panasonic FZ2500
37
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect auto focus
doesn't have liveview
continuous shooting slow (3.0 fps)
no image stabilization
low resolution (8 megapixels)
69
incredible zoom range (24-480mm 20.0 x zoom)
quiet mode (1/16,000 seconds)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (1")
supports tracking focus
lack of phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography details
Panasonic FZ2500 Travel photography details
45
flash built-in
doesn't have Timelapse mode
low resolution (8 megapixels)
does not contain selfie friendly display
66
boasts touch to focus
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
flash built-in
display is selfie friendly
fairly wide (24mm)
long zoom (480mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography advice
Panasonic FZ2500 Landscape photography advice
43
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (1.8")
doesn't have liveview
no image stabilization
low resolution (8MP)
max ISO too low (400)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
65
manual focus
fairly wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (20MP)
sensor size is nice (1")
saves RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging information
Panasonic FZ2500 Vlogging information
9
can't record video
66
fairly wide (24mm)
display is selfie friendly
touch screen
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect focus
high res video (4096 x 2160 resolution)
includes microphone socket
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FZ2500
 Olympus E-300Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus E-300 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500
Also called as EVOLT E-300 Lumix DMC-FZ2000
Category Advanced DSLR Large Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2005-01-10 2016-09-19
Physical type Mid-size SLR SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Venus Engine
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3264 x 2448 5472 x 3648
Maximum native ISO 400 12800
Maximum boosted ISO 1600 25600
Lowest native ISO 100 125
RAW pictures
Lowest boosted ISO - 80
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 3 49
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-480mm (20.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/2.8-4.5
Macro focus range - 3cm
Total lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 2.7
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Display diagonal 1.8 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 134k dots 1,040k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360k dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.74x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Maximum quiet shutter speed - 1/16000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames per sec 12.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 13.20 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Maximum video resolution None 4096x2160
Video data format - MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 624 gr (1.38 lbs) 915 gr (2.02 lbs)
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 70
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.0
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.6
DXO Low light score not tested 538
Other
Battery life - 350 images
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery model - DMW-BLC12
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Card slots 1 1
Retail pricing $800 $998