Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ300

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 front
Portability
59
Imaging
37
Features
73
Overall
51

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ300 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Announced January 2005
  • Also referred to as EVOLT E-300
  • Replacement is Olympus E-330
Panasonic FZ300
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1/16000s Max Shutter
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
  • 691g - 132 x 92 x 117mm
  • Released July 2015
  • Superseded the Panasonic FZ200
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ300 Overview

Here, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-300 versus Panasonic FZ300, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and FZ300 (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and FZ300 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizing.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-300 was manufactured 11 years earlier than the FZ300 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise view of how the E-300 scores vs the FZ300 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic FZ300

 E-300 FZ300 

Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ300 over the Olympus E-300

 FZ300 E-300 
ReleasedJuly 2015January 2005Fresher by 127 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen size3"1.8"Bigger screen (+1.2")
Screen resolution1040k134kClearer screen (+906k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FZ300

 E-300 FZ300 
Manual focus Dial exact focusing

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ300 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-300 comes with external measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ300 has proportions of 132mm x 92mm x 117mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.6") with a weight of 691 grams (1.52 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-300 versus Panasonic FZ300 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. The following is a front view size comparison of the E-300 and the FZ300.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ300 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and FZ300 is 67 and 59 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ300 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is very difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing simply by seeing a spec sheet. The visual below should provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and FZ300.

As you can see, each of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-300 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Panasonic FZ300 will show greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots way more aggressively. The older E-300 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ300 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-300
Portrait photography with Panasonic FZ300
48
focusing manually
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
no liveview
megapixel count low (8MP)
46
you can focus manually
has face detection autofocus
exports RAW files
MP count low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography highlights
Panasonic FZ300 Street photography highlights
51
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
59
screen articulates
has image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW files
has touch focus
environment proofing
small sensor size (1/2.3")
heavier than competition (691g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography details
Panasonic FZ300 Sports photography details
37
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect auto focus
no liveview
continuous shooting slow (3.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (8MP)
51
incredible zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
high shutter speed (1/16,000s)
has image stabilization (Optical)
has tracking autofocus
environment proofing
better than average battery power (380 shots)
MP count low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography highlights
Panasonic FZ300 Travel photography highlights
45
built-in flash
no Time Lapse function
megapixel count low (8MP)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
59
better than average battery power (380 per charge)
environment proofing
has touch focus
built-in flash
screen is selfie friendly
relatively wide (25mm)
very long zoom (600mm)
heavier than competition (691 grams)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography details
Panasonic FZ300 Landscape photography details
43
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (1.8")
no liveview
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
low maximum ISO (400)
no Time Lapse function
52
you can focus manually
relatively wide (25mm)
good sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW files
environment proofing
better than average battery power (380 per charge)
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging advice
Panasonic FZ300 Vlogging advice
9
can't record video
62
relatively wide (25mm)
screen is selfie friendly
built-in touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection autofocus
high res video (3840 x 2160 pixels)
has external mic port
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
heavier than competition (691 grams)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FZ300
 Olympus E-300Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus E-300 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300
Also referred to as EVOLT E-300 -
Type Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2005-01-10 2015-07-16
Body design Mid-size SLR SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Chip - Venus Engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3264 x 2448 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 400 6400
Max boosted ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 3 49
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-600mm (24.0x)
Max aperture - f/2.8
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Display size 1.8 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 134k dot 1,040k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,440k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 60s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/16000s
Continuous shooting speed 3.0fps 12.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 8.80 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, forced on, forced on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, forced off
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Max video resolution None 3840x2160
Video format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 624g (1.38 lbs) 691g (1.52 lbs)
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 132 x 92 x 117mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 380 photographs
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse recording
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $800 $598