Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ300
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
59 Imaging
37 Features
73 Overall
51
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Announced January 2005
- Also referred to as EVOLT E-300
- Replacement is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/16000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 691g - 132 x 92 x 117mm
- Released July 2015
- Superseded the Panasonic FZ200
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ300 Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-300 versus Panasonic FZ300, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and FZ300 (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and FZ300 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-300 was manufactured 11 years earlier than the FZ300 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise view of how the E-300 scores vs the FZ300 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ300 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-300 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Panasonic FZ300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic FZ300
E-300 | FZ300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ300 over the Olympus E-300
FZ300 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2015 | January 2005 | Fresher by 127 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 134k | Clearer screen (+906k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FZ300
E-300 | FZ300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focusing |
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ300 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-300 comes with external measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ300 has proportions of 132mm x 92mm x 117mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.6") with a weight of 691 grams (1.52 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-300 versus Panasonic FZ300 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. The following is a front view size comparison of the E-300 and the FZ300.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and FZ300 is 67 and 59 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ300 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing simply by seeing a spec sheet. The visual below should provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and FZ300.
As you can see, each of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-300 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Panasonic FZ300 will show greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots way more aggressively. The older E-300 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ300 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 |
Also referred to as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2005-01-10 | 2015-07-16 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Max boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display size | 1.8 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 134k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 8.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, forced on, forced on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, forced off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624g (1.38 lbs) | 691g (1.52 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 132 x 92 x 117mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 380 photographs |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $800 | $598 |