Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic GM1
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bac5b/bac5bbb1b3188a701eb58c897a8f12a9e6261c17" alt="Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9393/c9393a48f41aa83afba16c42cb39e0c329b26a22" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM1 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM1 front"
93 Imaging
53 Features
60 Overall
55
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic GM1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Revealed January 2005
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-300
- Refreshed by Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 204g - 99 x 55 x 30mm
- Launched December 2013
- New Model is Panasonic GM5
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic GM1 Overview
Here, we are matching up the Olympus E-300 versus Panasonic GM1, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and GM1 (16MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor size (Four Thirds).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-300 was launched 10 years earlier than the GM1 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic GM1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the E-300 grades versus the GM1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic GM1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-300 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM1. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Panasonic GM1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic GM1
E-300 | GM1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic GM1 over the Olympus E-300
GM1 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | December 2013 | ![]() | January 2005 | Newer by 108 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") |
Display resolution | 1036k | ![]() | 134k | Clearer display (+902k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic GM1
E-300 | GM1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic GM1 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera often, you have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-300 features physical measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") having a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Panasonic GM1 has sizing of 99mm x 55mm x 30mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.2") along with a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-300 versus Panasonic GM1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the E-300 versus the GM1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/027f1/027f12b6f64707d10618cf0d7d6ed38816eabdc2" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic GM1 size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic GM1 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and GM1 is 67 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c4fa/2c4fa2482baefa9ed67b449308f955106e3b6009" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic GM1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic GM1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic GM1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions purely by going over technical specs. The picture underneath may provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and GM1.
As you have seen, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Panasonic GM1 to deliver more detail utilizing its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3c64/b3c64cc435c407478bc66811e0c31307fb0239f7" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic GM1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic GM1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic GM1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df177/df177e2c0a5fbaf45d52cead431f75264c58a69c" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic GM1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic GM1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic GM1 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM1 |
Also referred to as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2005-01-10 | 2013-12-19 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4592 x 3448 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 25600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 45 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 1.8 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 134 thousand dots | 1,036 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/500 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | 1/50 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 24p), 1280 x 720p (60p, 50p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 624g (1.38 pounds) | 204g (0.45 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 99 x 55 x 30mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 66 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.3 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 660 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 230 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $800 | $750 |