Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic SZ1

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ1 front
Portability
95
Imaging
39
Features
34
Overall
37

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic SZ1 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Announced January 2005
  • Alternative Name is EVOLT E-300
  • Updated by Olympus E-330
Panasonic SZ1
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-250mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
  • 131g - 99 x 59 x 21mm
  • Launched January 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic SZ1 Overview

Following is a in depth review of the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic SZ1, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a significant gap between the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and SZ1 (16MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and SZ1 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizes.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-300 was brought out 8 years before the SZ1 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic SZ1 being a Compact camera.

Before going through a step-by-step comparison, below is a short summation of how the E-300 grades versus the SZ1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic SZ1

 E-300 SZ1 
Manual focus Very exact focusing

Reasons to pick Panasonic SZ1 over the Olympus E-300

 SZ1 E-300 
LaunchedJanuary 2012January 2005More modern by 85 months
Display dimension3"1.8"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution230k134kSharper display (+96k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic SZ1

 E-300 SZ1 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch display No Touch display

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic SZ1 Physical Comparison

If you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-300 has got external dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Panasonic SZ1 has sizing of 99mm x 59mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 131 grams (0.29 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic SZ1 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have at that time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the E-300 vs the SZ1.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic SZ1 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and SZ1 is 67 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic SZ1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic SZ1 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, its difficult to envision the gap between sensor sizes only by reading specifications. The picture below might offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and SZ1.

Plainly, each of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-300 due to its larger sensor will make achieving bokeh easier and the Panasonic SZ1 will offer you greater detail having its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic SZ1 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic SZ1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic SZ1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-300
Portrait photography with Panasonic SZ1
48
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
no liveview
low resolution (8MP)
34
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
offers face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
no external flash support
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-300
Street photography with Panasonic SZ1
51
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
63
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (131g)
fixed screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Sports photography camera
Panasonic SZ1 as a Sports photography camera
37
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect auto focus
no liveview
low fps (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (8MP)
40
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
low frames per second (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography factors
Panasonic SZ1 Travel photography factors
45
has built in flash
doesn't have Timelapse mode
low resolution (8 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly display
70
lighter than competitors (131 grams)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (25mm)
long reach (250mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.1)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-300
Landscape photography with Panasonic SZ1
43
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
tiny screen (1.8 inches)
no liveview
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (8 megapixels)
low maximum ISO (400)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
43
pretty wide (25mm)
decent sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
lack of manual focus
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
no manual exposure
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
lack of Time Lapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging advice
Panasonic SZ1 Vlogging advice
9
no video shooting
32
pretty wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection focusing
lighter than competitors (131g)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
screen is not selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external mic port
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic SZ1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Panasonic SZ1
 Olympus E-300Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ1
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus E-300 Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ1
Also Known as EVOLT E-300 -
Class Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2005-01-10 2012-01-09
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3264 x 2448 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 400 6400
Highest enhanced ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 3 23
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-250mm (10.0x)
Largest aperture - f/3.1-5.9
Macro focusing distance - 4cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 1.8" 3"
Screen resolution 134 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 8 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - 5.60 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1280x720
Video file format - MPEG-4
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624g (1.38 pounds) 131g (0.29 pounds)
Dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 99 x 59 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 250 images
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at release $800 $179