Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic SZ10

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ10 front
Portability
93
Imaging
40
Features
34
Overall
37

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic SZ10 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Launched January 2005
  • Additionally Known as EVOLT E-300
  • Renewed by Olympus E-330
Panasonic SZ10
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 177g - 99 x 60 x 30mm
  • Launched January 2015
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic SZ10 Overview

Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-300 versus Panasonic SZ10, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and SZ10 (16MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and SZ10 (1/2.3") boast different sensor measurements.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-300 was launched 11 years before the SZ10 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic SZ10 being a Compact camera.

Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a quick summation of how the E-300 scores versus the SZ10 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic SZ10

 E-300 SZ10 
Focus manually Very exact focusing

Reasons to pick Panasonic SZ10 over the Olympus E-300

 SZ10 E-300 
LaunchedJanuary 2015January 2005Fresher by 121 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen size3"1.8"Bigger screen (+1.2")
Screen resolution460k134kSharper screen (+326k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic SZ10

 E-300 SZ10 
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither includes Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic SZ10 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-300 features external dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") and a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Panasonic SZ10 has sizing of 99mm x 60mm x 30mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-300 versus Panasonic SZ10 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the E-300 versus the SZ10.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic SZ10 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and SZ10 is 67 and 93 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic SZ10 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic SZ10 Sensor Comparison

Normally, its hard to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing purely by looking through specs. The photograph below should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and SZ10.

As you can plainly see, both of those cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-300 due to its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Panasonic SZ10 will result in extra detail utilizing its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The older E-300 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic SZ10 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic SZ10 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic SZ10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 Portrait photography highlights
Panasonic SZ10 Portrait photography highlights
48
manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
low resolution sensor (8MP)
35
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
comes with face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography advice
Panasonic SZ10 Street photography advice
51
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
70
screen tilts
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others in class (177 grams)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography factors
Panasonic SZ10 Sports photography factors
37
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect auto focus
doesn't have liveview
max frames per second very slow (3.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
low resolution sensor (8MP)
34
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.4 fps)
no shutter priority
very small sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery pack (200 shots)
lack of phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography info
Panasonic SZ10 Travel photography info
45
has built in flash
lack of Time Lapse function
low resolution sensor (8 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
67
lighter than others in class (177g)
good megapixels (16MP)
has built in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
great reach (288mm)
missing Timelapse recording
bad battery pack (200 CIPA)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography advice
Panasonic SZ10 Landscape photography advice
43
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
tiny screen (1.8 inches)
doesn't have liveview
does not have image stabilization
low resolution sensor (8 megapixels)
low maximum ISO (400)
lack of Time Lapse function
41
fairly wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16MP)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
manual exposure not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
bad battery pack (200 CIPA)
missing Timelapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging details
Panasonic SZ10 Vlogging details
9
lack of video recording
32
fairly wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detect focusing
lighter than others in class (177g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
display is not selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing microphone socket
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic SZ10 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Panasonic SZ10
 Olympus E-300Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ10
General Information
Company Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus E-300 Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ10
Also referred to as EVOLT E-300 -
Type Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2005-01-10 2015-01-06
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3264 x 2448 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 400 1600
Maximum enhanced ISO 1600 6400
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-288mm (12.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.1-6.3
Available lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display sizing 1.8 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 134 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 8 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames per second 1.4 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - 5.20 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, on, slow sync w/redeye, off
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p), 320 x 240 (30p)
Maximum video resolution None 1280x720
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624g (1.38 lbs) 177g (0.39 lbs)
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 99 x 60 x 30mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 200 pictures
Battery type - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Cost at release $800 $200