Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic SZ10
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bac5b/bac5bbb1b3188a701eb58c897a8f12a9e6261c17" alt="Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba3e8/ba3e852d8fd2ac4c9d856754d60968dffd538032" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ10 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ10 front"
93 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic SZ10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Launched January 2005
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-300
- Renewed by Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 177g - 99 x 60 x 30mm
- Launched January 2015
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic SZ10 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-300 versus Panasonic SZ10, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and SZ10 (16MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and SZ10 (1/2.3") boast different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-300 was launched 11 years before the SZ10 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic SZ10 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a quick summation of how the E-300 scores versus the SZ10 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic SZ10 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-300 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ10. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Panasonic SZ10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic SZ10
E-300 | SZ10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic SZ10 over the Olympus E-300
SZ10 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2015 | ![]() | January 2005 | Fresher by 121 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 134k | Sharper screen (+326k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic SZ10
E-300 | SZ10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic SZ10 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-300 features external dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") and a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Panasonic SZ10 has sizing of 99mm x 60mm x 30mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-300 versus Panasonic SZ10 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the E-300 versus the SZ10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2cf4/d2cf47bfb464657a09e783431a66f6583e97cacb" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic SZ10 size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic SZ10 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and SZ10 is 67 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3bcd5/3bcd50943ff2a62c8086fa8c7c2b0d2655a0d4d4" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic SZ10 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic SZ10 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic SZ10 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing purely by looking through specs. The photograph below should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and SZ10.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-300 due to its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Panasonic SZ10 will result in extra detail utilizing its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The older E-300 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3c2f/b3c2f29aebdfaa81d99c6b00633f698c0a062a54" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic SZ10 sensor size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic SZ10 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic SZ10 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1427/f14272f26d1d83894e13709d2f59343f9455507e" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic SZ10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic SZ10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic SZ10 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ10 |
Also referred to as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2005-01-10 | 2015-01-06 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.1-6.3 |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 1.8 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 134 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | 1.4 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 5.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, on, slow sync w/redeye, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p), 320 x 240 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 624g (1.38 lbs) | 177g (0.39 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 99 x 60 x 30mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 200 pictures |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $800 | $200 |