Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic TS1
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bac5b/bac5bbb1b3188a701eb58c897a8f12a9e6261c17" alt="Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43ffc/43ffc5718422e6e3eca344eb7e4a55ae79707d20" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS1 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS1 front"
93 Imaging
34 Features
24 Overall
30
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic TS1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Released January 2005
- Also Known as EVOLT E-300
- New Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-128mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 189g - 98 x 63 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FT1
- New Model is Panasonic TS2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic TS1 Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic TS1, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and TS1 (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and TS1 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-300 was unveiled 5 years before the TS1 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic TS1 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a full comparison, below is a quick summary of how the E-300 grades vs the TS1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic TS1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-300 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS1. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Panasonic TS1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic TS1
E-300 | TS1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic TS1 over the Olympus E-300
TS1 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2009 | ![]() | January 2005 | Newer by 49 months |
Display dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.9") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 134k | Crisper display (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic TS1
E-300 | TS1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Absent Touch display |
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic TS1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-300 features external dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Panasonic TS1 has measurements of 98mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 189 grams (0.42 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic TS1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose at that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the E-300 versus the TS1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cdeec/cdeece5aac69a265a6486179ac64095662801983" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic TS1 size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic TS1 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and TS1 is 67 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b6de/8b6de40df41c0453d0ac6c209b510bb5f980cfec" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic TS1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic TS1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic TS1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to see the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reading technical specs. The image here should provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and TS1.
As you have seen, both of those cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-300 with its larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Panasonic TS1 will offer you more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e16a3/e16a3790a5a9ccf2f80ed2e7c61260346fdc1413" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic TS1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic TS1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic TS1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cffe4/cffe4ac6a724c56fd65830e4e02a1d6bfde4ab84" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic TS1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic TS1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic TS1 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS1 |
Also referred to as | EVOLT E-300 | Lumix DMC-FT1 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Released | 2005-01-10 | 2009-01-27 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-128mm (4.6x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 1.8 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 134k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1300 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | AVCHD Lite |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 624g (1.38 lb) | 189g (0.42 lb) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 98 x 63 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/MMC/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $800 | $380 |