Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic TS3
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
92 Imaging
35 Features
31 Overall
33
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic TS3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Introduced January 2005
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-300
- Newer Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-128mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 197g - 103 x 64 x 27mm
- Announced August 2011
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-FT3
- Old Model is Panasonic TS2
- New Model is Panasonic TS4
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic TS3 Overview
Following is a extensive analysis of the Olympus E-300 versus Panasonic TS3, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and TS3 (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and TS3 (1/2.3") use different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe E-300 was announced 7 years earlier than the TS3 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic TS3 being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a more detailed comparison, below is a simple overview of how the E-300 matches up vs the TS3 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic TS3 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-300 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS3. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Panasonic TS3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic TS3
E-300 | TS3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic TS3 over the Olympus E-300
TS3 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2011 | January 2005 | More modern by 80 months | |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.9") | |
Display resolution | 230k | 134k | Sharper display (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic TS3
E-300 | TS3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic TS3 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-300 comes with exterior measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Panasonic TS3 has proportions of 103mm x 64mm x 27mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 197 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-300 versus Panasonic TS3 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-300 against the TS3.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and TS3 is 67 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic TS3 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizes merely by reading specs. The pic here will provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and TS3.
As you can plainly see, both cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-300 using its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic TS3 will offer you extra detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics far more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic TS3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic TS3 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS3 |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-300 | Lumix DMC-FT3 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2005-01-10 | 2011-08-16 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-128mm (4.6x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 1.8 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 134k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1300 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624 gr (1.38 lbs) | 197 gr (0.43 lbs) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 103 x 64 x 27mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 310 pictures |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $800 | $380 |