Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZR1

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 front
Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
17
Overall
27

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZR1 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Announced January 2005
  • Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-300
  • Successor is Olympus E-330
Panasonic ZR1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-200mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 98 x 55 x 26mm
  • Revealed July 2009
  • Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-ZX1
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZR1 Overview

Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic ZR1, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and ZR1 (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and ZR1 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizes.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The E-300 was released 5 years before the ZR1 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZR1 being a Compact camera.

Before we go in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the E-300 matches up against the ZR1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic ZR1

 E-300 ZR1 
Focus manually Dial accurate focusing

Reasons to pick Panasonic ZR1 over the Olympus E-300

 ZR1 E-300 
RevealedJuly 2009January 2005More recent by 55 months
Display sizing2.7"1.8"Larger display (+0.9")
Display resolution230k134kSharper display (+96k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic ZR1

 E-300 ZR1 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch display Neither contains Touch display

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZR1 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 has got exterior measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Panasonic ZR1 has specifications of 98mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic ZR1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the E-300 against the ZR1.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZR1 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and ZR1 is 67 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZR1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZR1 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is tough to envision the gap between sensor measurements simply by looking at specifications. The visual here might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and ZR1.

To sum up, both cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-300 due to its larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Panasonic ZR1 will give extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a little more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZR1 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZR1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZR1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 Portrait photography factors
Panasonic ZR1 Portrait photography factors
48
manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
doesn't have liveview
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
21
manual focus not available
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
MP count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Street photography camera
Panasonic ZR1 as a Street photography camera
51
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
fixed screen
no image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
56
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography features
Panasonic ZR1 Sports photography features
37
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect autofocus
doesn't have liveview
slow frames per second (3.0 fps)
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (8MP)
25
built in image stabilization (Optical)
very slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
MP count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-300
Travel photography with Panasonic ZR1
45
built-in flash
lack of Timelapse function
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
does not feature selfie friendly display
57
flash built-in
fairly wide (25mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
MP count low (12MP)
does not offer selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.3)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography advice
Panasonic ZR1 Landscape photography advice
43
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
screen is somewhat small (1.8 inches)
doesn't have liveview
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
max ISO too low (400)
lack of Timelapse function
32
fairly wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
tiny screen (2.7")
manual mode not possible
MP count low (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Vlogging camera
Panasonic ZR1 as a Vlogging camera
9
can't record video
28
fairly wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
does not offer selfie friendly display
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have microphone socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZR1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Panasonic ZR1
 Olympus E-300Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1
General Information
Company Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus E-300 Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1
Also referred to as EVOLT E-300 Lumix DMC-ZX1
Category Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2005-01-10 2009-07-27
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - Venus Engine V
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3264 x 2448 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 400 6400
Max enhanced ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 3 11
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-200mm (8.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.3-5.9
Macro focus range - 3cm
Available lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 1.8 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of display 134k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames per sec 2.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - 5.10 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 624 gr (1.38 lbs) 158 gr (0.35 lbs)
Dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 98 x 55 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at release $800 $280