Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZR1
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bac5b/bac5bbb1b3188a701eb58c897a8f12a9e6261c17" alt="Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3a83/a3a8345ec89b1fa7b1b27cd7338ab82f26546b0c" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZR1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Announced January 2005
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-300
- Successor is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 158g - 98 x 55 x 26mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-ZX1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZR1 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic ZR1, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and ZR1 (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and ZR1 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-300 was released 5 years before the ZR1 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZR1 being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the E-300 matches up against the ZR1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZR1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-300 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Panasonic ZR1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic ZR1
E-300 | ZR1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZR1 over the Olympus E-300
ZR1 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2009 | ![]() | January 2005 | More recent by 55 months |
Display sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.9") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 134k | Sharper display (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic ZR1
E-300 | ZR1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZR1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 has got exterior measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Panasonic ZR1 has specifications of 98mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic ZR1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the E-300 against the ZR1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9e1a/b9e1a584c677f96000d69e8832d602b2280a69a6" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZR1 size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZR1 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and ZR1 is 67 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8864a/8864a2b1573eb7ad475cd82901d8a6d883e26784" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZR1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZR1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZR1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to envision the gap between sensor measurements simply by looking at specifications. The visual here might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and ZR1.
To sum up, both cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-300 due to its larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Panasonic ZR1 will give extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a little more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6163d/6163d2ae6431d29c9820752f5322c248326a83fd" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZR1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZR1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZR1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e52df/e52dfa44ee3a3a61eb16632b25f13eb2e0e59a8b" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZR1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZR1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZR1 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 |
Also referred to as | EVOLT E-300 | Lumix DMC-ZX1 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2005-01-10 | 2009-07-27 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Venus Engine V |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Max enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-200mm (8.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 1.8 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 134k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.10 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624 gr (1.38 lbs) | 158 gr (0.35 lbs) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 98 x 55 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $800 | $280 |