Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZR3
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
94 Imaging
36 Features
26 Overall
32
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZR3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Announced January 2005
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-300
- Renewed by Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 159g - 98 x 55 x 26mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-ZX3
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZR3 Overview
Here is a detailed assessment of the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic ZR3, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and ZR3 (14MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and ZR3 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-300 was manufactured 6 years earlier than the ZR3 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZR3 being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the E-300 scores vs the ZR3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZR3 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-300 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Panasonic ZR3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic ZR3
E-300 | ZR3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZR3 over the Olympus E-300
ZR3 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2010 | January 2005 | Fresher by 61 months | |
Display dimension | 2.7" | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.9") | |
Display resolution | 230k | 134k | Sharper display (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic ZR3
E-300 | ZR3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZR3 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 has physical dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") having a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Panasonic ZR3 has dimensions of 98mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic ZR3 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the E-300 against the ZR3.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and ZR3 is 67 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZR3 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizing simply by checking a spec sheet. The visual underneath may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and ZR3.
Clearly, both of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-300 featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Panasonic ZR3 will give you extra detail due to its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos much more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZR3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZR3 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 |
Also called | EVOLT E-300 | Lumix DMC-ZX3 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2005-01-10 | 2010-01-26 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Venus Engine HD II |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Max boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-200mm (8.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 1.8 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 134k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1300 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 5.30 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | AVCHD Lite |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 624 gr (1.38 lbs) | 159 gr (0.35 lbs) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 98 x 55 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $800 | $280 |