Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZR3

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 front
Portability
94
Imaging
36
Features
26
Overall
32

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZR3 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Announced January 2005
  • Alternate Name is EVOLT E-300
  • Renewed by Olympus E-330
Panasonic ZR3
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-200mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
  • 159g - 98 x 55 x 26mm
  • Introduced January 2010
  • Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-ZX3
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZR3 Overview

Here is a detailed assessment of the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic ZR3, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and ZR3 (14MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and ZR3 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizing.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-300 was manufactured 6 years earlier than the ZR3 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZR3 being a Compact camera.

Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the E-300 scores vs the ZR3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic ZR3

 E-300 ZR3 
Manual focus More exact focusing

Reasons to pick Panasonic ZR3 over the Olympus E-300

 ZR3 E-300 
IntroducedJanuary 2010January 2005Fresher by 61 months
Display dimension2.7"1.8"Larger display (+0.9")
Display resolution230k134kSharper display (+96k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic ZR3

 E-300 ZR3 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither has Touch friendly display

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZR3 Physical Comparison

In case you're looking to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 has physical dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") having a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Panasonic ZR3 has dimensions of 98mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic ZR3 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the E-300 against the ZR3.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZR3 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and ZR3 is 67 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZR3 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZR3 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizing simply by checking a spec sheet. The visual underneath may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and ZR3.

Clearly, both of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-300 featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Panasonic ZR3 will give you extra detail due to its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos much more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZR3 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZR3 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZR3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-300
Portrait photography with Panasonic ZR3
48
you can focus manually
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
does not have liveview
sensor resolution not great (8MP)
28
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography highlights
Panasonic ZR3 Street photography highlights
51
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
56
image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-300
Sports photography with Panasonic ZR3
37
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
has phase detect auto focus
does not have liveview
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (8 megapixels)
36
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
includes tracking autofocus
max shutter speed is low (1/1,300s)
painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography highlights
Panasonic ZR3 Travel photography highlights
45
built-in flash
does not have Time Lapse recording
sensor resolution not great (8 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
64
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (25mm)
no Time Lapse function
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography advice
Panasonic ZR3 Landscape photography advice
43
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
small screen (1.8 inch)
does not have liveview
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (8 megapixels)
low maximum ISO (400)
does not have Time Lapse recording
37
rather wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
no Time Lapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging factors
Panasonic ZR3 Vlogging factors
9
can't record video
29
rather wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external mic jack
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZR3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Panasonic ZR3
 Olympus E-300Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3
General Information
Company Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus E-300 Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3
Also called EVOLT E-300 Lumix DMC-ZX3
Type Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2005-01-10 2010-01-26
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - Venus Engine HD II
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3264 x 2448 4320 x 3240
Max native ISO 400 6400
Max boosted ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 3 11
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-200mm (8.0x)
Largest aperture - f/3.3-5.9
Macro focusing distance - 3cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 1.8 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 134k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/1300 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.0fps 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - 5.30 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - AVCHD Lite
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624 gr (1.38 lbs) 159 gr (0.35 lbs)
Dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 98 x 55 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $800 $280