Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS10

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 front
Portability
91
Imaging
37
Features
46
Overall
40

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS10 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Revealed January 2005
  • Alternative Name is EVOLT E-300
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-330
Panasonic ZS10
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
  • 219g - 105 x 58 x 33mm
  • Introduced January 2011
  • Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-TZ20 / Lumix DMC-TZ22
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS10 Overview

Let's examine more in depth at the Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS10, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and ZS10 (14MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and ZS10 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizes.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-300 was unveiled 7 years earlier than the ZS10 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS10 being a Compact camera.

Before delving in to a complete comparison, below is a quick view of how the E-300 matches up versus the ZS10 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic ZS10

 E-300 ZS10 
Manually focus Dial exact focus

Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS10 over the Olympus E-300

 ZS10 E-300 
IntroducedJanuary 2011January 2005Fresher by 73 months
Display dimension3"1.8"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution460k134kClearer display (+326k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic ZS10

 E-300 ZS10 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS10 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-300 comes with outside measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") and a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS10 has proportions of 105mm x 58mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 219 grams (0.48 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS10 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the E-300 compared to the ZS10.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS10 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and ZS10 is 67 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS10 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS10 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing simply by researching a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and ZS10.

As you can see, each of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-300 having a larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic ZS10 will provide you with extra detail having an extra 6MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos much more aggressively. The older E-300 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS10 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS10 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 Portrait photography information
Panasonic ZS10 Portrait photography information
48
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
does not have liveview
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
30
MP count decent (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
no external flash support
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography information
Panasonic ZS10 Street photography information
51
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
65
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with focus via touch
lighter than average (219g)
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-300
Sports photography with Panasonic ZS10
37
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect auto focus
does not have liveview
low fps (3.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8MP)
47
incredible zoom range (24-384mm 16.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (14MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
low battery pack (260 CIPA)
does not have phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography information
Panasonic ZS10 Travel photography information
45
has built in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
sensor resolution low (8MP)
display is not selfie friendly
67
lighter than average (219g)
comes with focus via touch
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
long zoom (384mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
low battery pack (260 per charge)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Landscape photography camera
Panasonic ZS10 as a Landscape photography camera
43
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (1.8 inch)
does not have liveview
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8MP)
low maximum ISO (400)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
42
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
low battery pack (260 per charge)
lack of Timelapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-300
Vlogging with Panasonic ZS10
9
lack of video recording
34
reasonably wide (24mm)
has touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than average (219 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of external microphone jack
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS10 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Panasonic ZS10
 Olympus E-300Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10
General Information
Make Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus E-300 Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-300 Lumix DMC-TZ20 / Lumix DMC-TZ22
Type Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2005-01-10 2011-01-25
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - Venus Engine FHD
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3264 x 2448 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 400 6400
Maximum enhanced ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 3 23
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-384mm (16.0x)
Largest aperture - f/3.3-5.9
Macro focus distance - 3cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 1.8" 3"
Screen resolution 134 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames per second 10.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - 5.00 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 624 grams (1.38 pounds) 219 grams (0.48 pounds)
Dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 105 x 58 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 260 images
Battery format - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Launch price $800 $350