Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS10
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
91 Imaging
37 Features
46 Overall
40
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Revealed January 2005
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-300
- Newer Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 219g - 105 x 58 x 33mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-TZ20 / Lumix DMC-TZ22
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS10 Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS10, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and ZS10 (14MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and ZS10 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-300 was unveiled 7 years earlier than the ZS10 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS10 being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a complete comparison, below is a quick view of how the E-300 matches up versus the ZS10 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS10 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-300 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Panasonic ZS10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic ZS10
E-300 | ZS10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS10 over the Olympus E-300
ZS10 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2011 | January 2005 | Fresher by 73 months | |
Display dimension | 3" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 134k | Clearer display (+326k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic ZS10
E-300 | ZS10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS10 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-300 comes with outside measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") and a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS10 has proportions of 105mm x 58mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 219 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS10 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the E-300 compared to the ZS10.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and ZS10 is 67 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS10 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing simply by researching a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and ZS10.
As you can see, each of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-300 having a larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic ZS10 will provide you with extra detail having an extra 6MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos much more aggressively. The older E-300 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS10 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-300 | Lumix DMC-TZ20 / Lumix DMC-TZ22 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2005-01-10 | 2011-01-25 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-384mm (16.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 1.8" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 134 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624 grams (1.38 pounds) | 219 grams (0.48 pounds) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 105 x 58 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 images |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $800 | $350 |