Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS15
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS15 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Revealed January 2005
- Also Known as EVOLT E-300
- Updated by Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 208g - 105 x 58 x 33mm
- Released June 2012
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ25
- Renewed by Panasonic ZS20
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS15 Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-300 versus Panasonic ZS15, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and ZS15 (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and ZS15 (1/2.3") feature different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-300 was launched 8 years earlier than the ZS15 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS15 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the E-300 scores versus the ZS15 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS15 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-300 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Panasonic ZS15 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic ZS15
E-300 | ZS15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS15 over the Olympus E-300
ZS15 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2012 | January 2005 | More modern by 90 months | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 134k | Crisper screen (+326k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic ZS15
E-300 | ZS15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS15 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 has got outer measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") having a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS15 has dimensions of 105mm x 58mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-300 versus Panasonic ZS15 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have during that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the E-300 compared to the ZS15.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and ZS15 is 67 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS15 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizes simply by viewing a spec sheet. The image below should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and ZS15.
As you can see, both of those cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-300 because of its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Panasonic ZS15 will provide you with more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS15 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS15 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15 |
Also referred to as | EVOLT E-300 | Lumix DMC-TZ25 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2005-01-10 | 2012-06-29 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Max boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-384mm (16.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 1.8 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 134k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 15 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 6.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 624 grams (1.38 lbs) | 208 grams (0.46 lbs) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 105 x 58 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 pictures |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $800 | $279 |