Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS15
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37


92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS15 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Revealed January 2005
- Also Known as EVOLT E-300
- Updated by Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 208g - 105 x 58 x 33mm
- Released June 2012
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ25
- Renewed by Panasonic ZS20

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS15 Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-300 versus Panasonic ZS15, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and ZS15 (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and ZS15 (1/2.3") feature different sensor size.

The E-300 was launched 8 years earlier than the ZS15 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS15 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the E-300 scores versus the ZS15 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS15 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-300 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Panasonic ZS15 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic ZS15
E-300 | ZS15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS15 over the Olympus E-300
ZS15 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2012 | ![]() | January 2005 | More modern by 90 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 134k | Crisper screen (+326k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic ZS15
E-300 | ZS15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS15 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 has got outer measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") having a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS15 has dimensions of 105mm x 58mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-300 versus Panasonic ZS15 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have during that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the E-300 compared to the ZS15.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and ZS15 is 67 and 92 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS15 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizes simply by viewing a spec sheet. The image below should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and ZS15.
As you can see, both of those cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-300 because of its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Panasonic ZS15 will provide you with more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS15 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS15 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15 |
Also referred to as | EVOLT E-300 | Lumix DMC-TZ25 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2005-01-10 | 2012-06-29 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Max boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-384mm (16.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 1.8 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 134k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 15 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 6.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 624 grams (1.38 lbs) | 208 grams (0.46 lbs) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 105 x 58 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 pictures |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $800 | $279 |