Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS25

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 front
Portability
93
Imaging
40
Features
43
Overall
41

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS25 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Revealed January 2005
  • Also referred to as EVOLT E-300
  • New Model is Olympus E-330
Panasonic ZS25
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
  • 193g - 105 x 59 x 28mm
  • Announced January 2013
  • Also referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ35
  • Old Model is Panasonic ZS20
  • Refreshed by Panasonic ZS30
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS25 Overview

Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-300 versus Panasonic ZS25, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and ZS25 (16MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and ZS25 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor dimensions.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-300 was announced 9 years before the ZS25 which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS25 being a Compact camera.

Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the E-300 scores against the ZS25 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic ZS25

 E-300 ZS25 
Focus manually Very accurate focus

Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS25 over the Olympus E-300

 ZS25 E-300 
AnnouncedJanuary 2013January 2005More modern by 97 months
Screen size3"1.8"Bigger screen (+1.2")
Screen resolution460k134kCrisper screen (+326k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic ZS25

 E-300 ZS25 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch screen Neither features Touch screen

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS25 Physical Comparison

If you are looking to carry around your camera, you should factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-300 enjoys external measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS25 has sizing of 105mm x 59mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-300 versus Panasonic ZS25 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you use at that moment. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the E-300 versus the ZS25.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS25 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and ZS25 is 67 and 93 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS25 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS25 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it can be difficult to see the difference between sensor sizes merely by reading specifications. The pic here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and ZS25.

Plainly, each of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-300 with its bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF easier and the Panasonic ZS25 will deliver extra detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS25 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS25 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 Portrait photography advice
Panasonic ZS25 Portrait photography advice
48
you can focus manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
no liveview
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
32
decent MP (16MP)
no manual focus
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-300
Street photography with Panasonic ZS25
51
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
no moving screen
no image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
66
has image stabilization (Optical)
has focus by touch
lighter than competition in class (193 grams)
no moving screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography highlights
Panasonic ZS25 Sports photography highlights
37
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
has phase detect AF
no liveview
slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
45
incredible zoom range (24-480mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16MP)
provides tracking autofocus
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,200s)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
low battery (260 per charge)
has no phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-300
Travel photography with Panasonic ZS25
45
flash built-in
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
69
lighter than competition in class (193g)
has focus by touch
decent MP (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (24mm)
great zoom (480mm)
missing Timelapse function
low battery (260 shots)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-300
Landscape photography with Panasonic ZS25
43
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (1.8")
no liveview
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
maximum ISO low (400)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
43
really wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
no manual focus
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
low battery (260 shots)
missing Timelapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging features
Panasonic ZS25 Vlogging features
9
no video shooting
34
really wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition in class (193g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
screen isn't selfie friendly
missing external microphone port
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS25 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Panasonic ZS25
 Olympus E-300Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus E-300 Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25
Also referred to as EVOLT E-300 Lumix DMC-TZ35
Class Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2005-01-10 2013-01-07
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3264 x 2448 4896 x 3672
Maximum native ISO 400 6400
Maximum boosted ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 3 23
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-480mm (20.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.3-6.4
Macro focus distance - 3cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 1.8 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 134 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 15s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1200s
Continuous shooting speed 3.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 6.40 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (220 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 624 grams (1.38 lb) 193 grams (0.43 lb)
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 105 x 59 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 260 photographs
Battery form - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $800 $300