Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS25
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bac5b/bac5bbb1b3188a701eb58c897a8f12a9e6261c17" alt="Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5708/e57084ceb52f3aee5776564caad37a3d062fbbca" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 front"
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Revealed January 2005
- Also referred to as EVOLT E-300
- New Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 28mm
- Announced January 2013
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ35
- Old Model is Panasonic ZS20
- Refreshed by Panasonic ZS30
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS25 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-300 versus Panasonic ZS25, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and ZS25 (16MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and ZS25 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-300 was announced 9 years before the ZS25 which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS25 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the E-300 scores against the ZS25 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS25 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-300 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Panasonic ZS25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic ZS25
E-300 | ZS25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS25 over the Olympus E-300
ZS25 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | ![]() | January 2005 | More modern by 97 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 134k | Crisper screen (+326k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic ZS25
E-300 | ZS25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS25 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera, you should factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-300 enjoys external measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS25 has sizing of 105mm x 59mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-300 versus Panasonic ZS25 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you use at that moment. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the E-300 versus the ZS25.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2bbc0/2bbc088991aba49e67c2398caf8472891dc6f677" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS25 size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS25 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and ZS25 is 67 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82a06/82a060aad0bf11e582dc50936ab468d8284f2395" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS25 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS25 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS25 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to see the difference between sensor sizes merely by reading specifications. The pic here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and ZS25.
Plainly, each of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-300 with its bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF easier and the Panasonic ZS25 will deliver extra detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a35b/2a35b2ce1d9e4fc24d8eab2cc061280fe60fc2b3" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS25 sensor size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS25 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS25 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60513/60513887c6e35ee0250509bf058be2e5467baf7b" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS25 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 |
Also referred to as | EVOLT E-300 | Lumix DMC-TZ35 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2005-01-10 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 1.8 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 134 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 15s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1200s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 6.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (220 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624 grams (1.38 lb) | 193 grams (0.43 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 105 x 59 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 photographs |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $800 | $300 |