Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS3
67 Imaging
40 Features
31 Overall
36
91 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Announced January 2005
- Other Name is EVOLT E-300
- Successor is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-4.9) lens
- 229g - 103 x 60 x 33mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-TZ7
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS3 Overview
Here is a in depth comparison of the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic ZS3, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the E-300 (8MP) and the ZS3 (10MP) is fairly close but the E-300 (Four Thirds) and ZS3 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-300 was released 5 years prior to the ZS3 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS3 being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-300 scores versus the ZS3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS3 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-300 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Panasonic ZS3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic ZS3
| E-300 | ZS3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS3 over the Olympus E-300
| ZS3 | E-300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2009 | January 2005 | Fresher by 52 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 134k | Crisper display (+326k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic ZS3
| E-300 | ZS3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 enjoys outside measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS3 has specifications of 103mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 229 grams (0.50 lbs).
See the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic ZS3 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the E-300 vs the ZS3.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and ZS3 is 67 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS3 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing merely by looking through specs. The visual below might provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and ZS3.
All in all, the 2 cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-300 due to its larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic ZS3 will provide you with greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The older E-300 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS3 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS3 Specifications
| Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3 |
| Other name | EVOLT E-300 | Lumix DMC-TZ7 |
| Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2005-01-10 | 2009-05-14 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
| Total lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 1.8 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 134k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.30 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | - | AVCHD Lite |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 624g (1.38 pounds) | 229g (0.50 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 103 x 60 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $800 | $200 |