Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS3
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
91 Imaging
33 Features
30 Overall
31
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Announced January 2005
- Other Name is EVOLT E-300
- Successor is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-4.9) lens
- 229g - 103 x 60 x 33mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-TZ7
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS3 Overview
Here is a in depth comparison of the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic ZS3, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the E-300 (8MP) and the ZS3 (10MP) is fairly close but the E-300 (Four Thirds) and ZS3 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizing.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-300 was released 5 years prior to the ZS3 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS3 being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-300 scores versus the ZS3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS3 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-300 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Panasonic ZS3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic ZS3
| E-300 | ZS3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS3 over the Olympus E-300
| ZS3 | E-300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2009 | January 2005 | Fresher by 52 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 134k | Crisper display (+326k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic ZS3
| E-300 | ZS3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 enjoys outside measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS3 has specifications of 103mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 229 grams (0.50 lbs).
See the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic ZS3 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the E-300 vs the ZS3.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and ZS3 is 67 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS3 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing merely by looking through specs. The visual below might provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and ZS3.
All in all, the 2 cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-300 due to its larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic ZS3 will provide you with greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The older E-300 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS3 Specifications
| Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3 |
| Other name | EVOLT E-300 | Lumix DMC-TZ7 |
| Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2005-01-10 | 2009-05-14 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
| Total lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 1.8 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 134k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.30 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | - | AVCHD Lite |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 624g (1.38 pounds) | 229g (0.50 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 103 x 60 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $800 | $200 |