Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS40
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
90 Imaging
43 Features
58 Overall
49
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS40 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Announced January 2005
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-300
- Newer Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 240g - 111 x 64 x 34mm
- Introduced January 2014
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ60
- Old Model is Panasonic ZS35
- Replacement is Panasonic ZS45
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS40 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic ZS40, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and ZS40 (18MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and ZS40 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-300 was unveiled 10 years prior to the ZS40 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS40 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the E-300 matches up vs the ZS40 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS40 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-300 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS40. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Panasonic ZS40 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic ZS40
E-300 | ZS40 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS40 over the Olympus E-300
ZS40 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | January 2005 | More modern by 109 months | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 134k | Crisper display (+786k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic ZS40
E-300 | ZS40 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither offers Touch display |
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS40 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 offers outer measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS40 has dimensions of 111mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 240 grams (0.53 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic ZS40 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the E-300 and the ZS40.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and ZS40 is 67 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS40 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to envision the difference between sensor sizes purely by reading through technical specs. The pic below should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and ZS40.
As you can tell, the two cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-300 having a larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Panasonic ZS40 will give you extra detail having an extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS40 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS40 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS40 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS40 |
Alternate name | EVOLT E-300 | Lumix DMC-TZ60 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2005-01-10 | 2014-01-06 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 1.8 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 134 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 200 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 6.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p/60i/30p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 624 grams (1.38 lb) | 240 grams (0.53 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 111 x 64 x 34mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $800 | $450 |