Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS5
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bac5b/bac5bbb1b3188a701eb58c897a8f12a9e6261c17" alt="Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2eaa8/2eaa8d035b73ee44320a189d3ab6e657e21b47f9" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS5 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS5 front"
92 Imaging
35 Features
30 Overall
33
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Announced January 2005
- Other Name is EVOLT E-300
- Later Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-4.9) lens
- 214g - 103 x 60 x 32mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-TZ8
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS5 Overview
In this article, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS5, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and ZS5 (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and ZS5 (1/2.3") come with different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-300 was brought out 6 years prior to the ZS5 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS5 being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the E-300 matches up versus the ZS5 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS5 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-300 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS5. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Panasonic ZS5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic ZS5
E-300 | ZS5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS5 over the Olympus E-300
ZS5 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2010 | ![]() | January 2005 | More recent by 66 months |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+0.9") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 134k | Clearer screen (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic ZS5
E-300 | ZS5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS5 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-300 has outer dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS5 has sizing of 103mm x 60mm x 32mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS5 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the E-300 and the ZS5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0684a/0684a355c44d1fa474eaba475ce0e4e23dc7e21d" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS5 size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS5 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and ZS5 is 67 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17da5/17da5166c39f23e20393a7f7f5da395dfe8c12e6" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS5 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS5 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS5 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to imagine the difference in sensor measurements purely by researching specs. The graphic here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and ZS5.
All in all, both of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-300 due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Panasonic ZS5 will provide you with greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older E-300 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/efb07/efb07f86589d6f59c1e80020075cd879ff82cc01" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS5 sensor size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS5 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS5 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3479/d34797bec121d63ed6d078a3c74cb89a64a07b14" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS5 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS5 |
Also called | EVOLT E-300 | Lumix DMC-TZ8 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2005-01-10 | 2010-06-16 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine HD II |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.3-4.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 1.8 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 134k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1300 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.30 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624 grams (1.38 pounds) | 214 grams (0.47 pounds) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 103 x 60 x 32mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $800 | $300 |