Olympus E-300 vs Pentax MX-1
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bac5b/bac5bbb1b3188a701eb58c897a8f12a9e6261c17" alt="Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2dcc/c2dccc339151be15969ec6f5278f594ec973c860" alt="Pentax MX-1 front Pentax MX-1 front"
84 Imaging
37 Features
60 Overall
46
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax MX-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Announced January 2005
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-300
- Successor is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 391g - 122 x 61 x 51mm
- Announced July 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax MX-1 Overview
Below is a in-depth overview of the Olympus E-300 and Pentax MX-1, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Pentax. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and MX-1 (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and MX-1 (1/1.7") boast totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-300 was brought out 9 years before the MX-1 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Pentax MX-1 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a short highlight of how the E-300 grades vs the MX-1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax MX-1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-300 & Pentax MX-1. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Pentax MX-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Pentax MX-1
E-300 | MX-1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax MX-1 over the Olympus E-300
MX-1 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2013 | ![]() | January 2005 | More recent by 103 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 134k | Sharper screen (+786k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Pentax MX-1
E-300 | MX-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax MX-1 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-300 provides outside dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Pentax MX-1 has proportions of 122mm x 61mm x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") having a weight of 391 grams (0.86 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-300 and Pentax MX-1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the E-300 and the MX-1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae008/ae0089c4da95835b181034117d4ee55726f2ac59" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Pentax MX-1 size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Pentax MX-1 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and MX-1 is 67 and 84 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55394/55394485fc8f2cfa93bacd4b1b4d19a11fe0f42b" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Pentax MX-1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-300 vs Pentax MX-1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax MX-1 Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to see the gap between sensor measurements purely by looking at technical specs. The visual underneath may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and MX-1.
As you have seen, each of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-300 because of its bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Pentax MX-1 will give you more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures way more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bbbf5/bbbf5ae49493589ee7b18843bcf2aa8b98cf86ac" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Pentax MX-1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Pentax MX-1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax MX-1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a323/3a3235aa48e199b1266acc234e2fe95b6750fa95" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Pentax MX-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-300 vs Pentax MX-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax MX-1 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Pentax MX-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus E-300 | Pentax MX-1 |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2005-01-10 | 2013-07-01 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 12800 |
Max boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 1.8 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 134k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 12.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Speed sync, Trailing Curtain sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 624 grams (1.38 lb) | 391 grams (0.86 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 122 x 61 x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 208 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 290 photographs |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-Li-106 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $800 | $400 |