Olympus E-300 vs Pentax E70
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
94 Imaging
33 Features
11 Overall
24
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax E70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Introduced January 2005
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-300
- Later Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 175g - 94 x 61 x 26mm
- Launched January 2009
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax E70 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Olympus E-300 vs Pentax E70, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the E-300 (8MP) and the E70 (10MP) is fairly comparable but the E-300 (Four Thirds) and E70 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizes.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-300 was revealed 5 years prior to the E70 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Pentax E70 being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a quick overview of how the E-300 matches up versus the E70 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax E70 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-300 & Pentax Optio E70. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Pentax E70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Pentax E70
E-300 | E70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
Display resolution | 134k | 112k | Sharper display (+22k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax E70 over the Olympus E-300
E70 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2009 | January 2005 | More recent by 48 months | |
Display dimension | 2.4" | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.6") |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Pentax E70
E-300 | E70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax E70 Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 comes with exterior measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Pentax E70 has dimensions of 94mm x 61mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.0") with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-300 vs Pentax E70 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the E-300 vs the E70.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and E70 is 67 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax E70 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to visualise the gap in sensor measurements merely by going through specifications. The visual below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and E70.
To sum up, both the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-300 using its larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Pentax E70 will produce extra detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The older E-300 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax E70 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax E70 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Pentax Optio E70 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Pentax Optio E70 |
Also called as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2005-01-10 | 2009-01-05 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.1-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 10cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 1.8 inch | 2.4 inch |
Resolution of screen | 134k dots | 112k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624g (1.38 lbs) | 175g (0.39 lbs) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 94 x 61 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | 2 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $800 | $140 |