Olympus E-300 vs Pentax E85
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
95 Imaging
35 Features
10 Overall
25
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax E85 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Introduced January 2005
- Also Known as EVOLT E-300
- New Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 32-96mm (F2.9-5.2) lens
- 145g - 93 x 58 x 24mm
- Launched September 2009
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax E85 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-300 vs Pentax E85, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and E85 (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and E85 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-300 was unveiled 5 years earlier than the E85 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Pentax E85 being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-300 scores against the E85 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax E85 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-300 and Pentax Optio E85. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Pentax E85 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Pentax E85
E-300 | E85 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Pentax E85 over the Olympus E-300
E85 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2009 | January 2005 | Fresher by 57 months | |
Display size | 2.7" | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.9") | |
Display resolution | 230k | 134k | Crisper display (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Pentax E85
E-300 | E85 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax E85 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 has got external dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Pentax E85 has dimensions of 93mm x 58mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 145 grams (0.32 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-300 vs Pentax E85 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the E-300 against the E85.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and E85 is 67 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax E85 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizing simply by checking technical specs. The graphic below should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and E85.
As you can tell, both of those cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-300 having a larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Pentax E85 will give you more detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics way more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax E85 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax E85 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Pentax Optio E85 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus E-300 | Pentax Optio E85 |
Alternate name | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2005-01-10 | 2009-09-17 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 32-96mm (3.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.9-5.2 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 1.8 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 134k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 2 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 624g (1.38 lb) | 145g (0.32 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 93 x 58 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | D-LI95 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $800 | $0 |