Olympus E-300 vs Pentax W80
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax W80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Launched January 2005
- Other Name is EVOLT E-300
- Replacement is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 156g - 100 x 56 x 25mm
- Announced June 2009
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax W80 Overview
The following is a complete overview of the Olympus E-300 vs Pentax W80, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and W80 (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and W80 (1/2.3") use different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-300 was released 5 years prior to the W80 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Pentax W80 being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summary of how the E-300 matches up vs the W80 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax W80 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-300 & Pentax Optio W80. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Pentax W80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Pentax W80
E-300 | W80 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax W80 over the Olympus E-300
W80 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | June 2009 | January 2005 | Newer by 54 months | |
Screen sizing | 2.5" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+0.7") | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 134k | Crisper screen (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Pentax W80
E-300 | W80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax W80 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera often, you should factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 enjoys exterior dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") and a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Pentax W80 has specifications of 100mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-300 vs Pentax W80 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the E-300 versus the W80.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and W80 is 67 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax W80 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by looking at technical specs. The image here might give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and W80.
As you have seen, both of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-300 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh easier and the Pentax W80 will give extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax W80 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax W80 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Pentax Optio W80 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Pentax Optio W80 |
Also called | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2005-01-10 | 2009-06-25 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 1.8" | 2.5" |
Screen resolution | 134 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.90 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624 gr (1.38 lb) | 156 gr (0.34 lb) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 100 x 56 x 25mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | D-LI78 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $800 | $250 |