Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS front
Portability
91
Imaging
39
Features
37
Overall
38

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Released January 2005
  • Alternate Name is EVOLT E-300
  • Replacement is Olympus E-330
Pentax WG-2 GPS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 198g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
  • Released February 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Overview

In this write-up, we will be matching up the Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Pentax. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and WG-2 GPS (16MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and WG-2 GPS (1/2.3") feature different sensor dimensions.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-300 was introduced 8 years before the WG-2 GPS and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Pentax WG-2 GPS being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight into a full comparison, below is a quick overview of how the E-300 scores against the WG-2 GPS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Pentax WG-2 GPS

 E-300 WG-2 GPS 

Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 GPS over the Olympus E-300

 WG-2 GPS E-300 
ReleasedFebruary 2012January 2005Fresher by 86 months
Screen sizing3"1.8"Bigger screen (+1.2")
Screen resolution460k134kCrisper screen (+326k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Pentax WG-2 GPS

 E-300 WG-2 GPS 
Focus manually More accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither comes with Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Physical Comparison

For those who are going to carry your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 comes with external dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Pentax WG-2 GPS has specifications of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the E-300 versus the WG-2 GPS.

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and WG-2 GPS is 67 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizing simply by reading specs. The graphic below may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and WG-2 GPS.

All in all, both of those cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-300 having a bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh less difficult and the Pentax WG-2 GPS will offer you extra detail using its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 Portrait photography details
Pentax WG-2 GPS Portrait photography details
48
focusing manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
no liveview
resolution not great (8 megapixels)
40
manual focus
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
features face detection autofocus
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography highlights
Pentax WG-2 GPS Street photography highlights
51
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
54
environment proofing
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography features
Pentax WG-2 GPS Sports photography features
37
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect AF
no liveview
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
resolution not great (8MP)
38
decent megapixels (16MP)
features tracking autofocus
environment proofing
low frames per second (1.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography factors
Pentax WG-2 GPS Travel photography factors
45
flash built-in
missing Timelapse recording
resolution not great (8MP)
display is not selfie friendly
70
environment proofing
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (28mm)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-300
Landscape photography with Pentax WG-2 GPS
43
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
tiny screen (1.8 inch)
no liveview
does not have image stabilization
resolution not great (8MP)
maximum ISO low (400)
missing Timelapse recording
47
manual focus
rather wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
environment proofing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
manual exposure not available
no image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging factors
Pentax WG-2 GPS Vlogging factors
9
can't record video
30
rather wide (28mm)
features face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
does not have external microphone port
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Pentax WG-2 GPS
 Olympus E-300Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Pentax
Model type Olympus E-300 Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS
Also called EVOLT E-300 -
Class Advanced DSLR Waterproof
Released 2005-01-10 2012-02-07
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3264 x 2448 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 400 6400
Maximum boosted ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 125
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.5-5.5
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 1.8 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 134k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech - Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - 5.40 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624g (1.38 lb) 198g (0.44 lb)
Dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 260 shots
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $800 $300