Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bac5b/bac5bbb1b3188a701eb58c897a8f12a9e6261c17" alt="Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1b1a/c1b1aca5a367ce52d585dfa9c9ef670048d691fe" alt="Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS front Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS front"
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Released January 2005
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-300
- Replacement is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 198g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Released February 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Overview
In this write-up, we will be matching up the Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Pentax. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and WG-2 GPS (16MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and WG-2 GPS (1/2.3") feature different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-300 was introduced 8 years before the WG-2 GPS and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Pentax WG-2 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a full comparison, below is a quick overview of how the E-300 scores against the WG-2 GPS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-300 and Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Pentax WG-2 GPS
E-300 | WG-2 GPS |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 GPS over the Olympus E-300
WG-2 GPS | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2012 | ![]() | January 2005 | Fresher by 86 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 134k | Crisper screen (+326k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Pentax WG-2 GPS
E-300 | WG-2 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 comes with external dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Pentax WG-2 GPS has specifications of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the E-300 versus the WG-2 GPS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67d81/67d8120f7f57a2b548349e2a805feabeb4bbc495" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and WG-2 GPS is 67 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f744f/f744f1ce29ce7eeba5adfd5ee3e5f5d2cdc6b1b9" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizing simply by reading specs. The graphic below may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and WG-2 GPS.
All in all, both of those cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-300 having a bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh less difficult and the Pentax WG-2 GPS will offer you extra detail using its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96077/9607707e475e50b38d7b5afd026ce733e377011c" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS sensor size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a46d/2a46dea055b55885bc968ca4138eede923c6af5b" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus E-300 | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS |
Also called | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Released | 2005-01-10 | 2012-02-07 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 1.8 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 134k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 5.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 624g (1.38 lb) | 198g (0.44 lb) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 shots |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $800 | $300 |