Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax Q-S1

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Pentax Q-S1 front
Portability
92
Imaging
38
Features
54
Overall
44

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax Q-S1 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Introduced January 2005
  • Alternative Name is EVOLT E-300
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-330
Pentax Q-S1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Pentax Q Mount
  • 203g - 105 x 58 x 34mm
  • Announced August 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax Q-S1 Overview

The following is a comprehensive analysis of the Olympus E-300 versus Pentax Q-S1, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and Q-S1 (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and Q-S1 (1/1.7") feature different sensor measurements.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The E-300 was manufactured 10 years before the Q-S1 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Pentax Q-S1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple overview of how the E-300 grades vs the Q-S1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Pentax Q-S1

 E-300 Q-S1 

Reasons to pick Pentax Q-S1 over the Olympus E-300

 Q-S1 E-300 
AnnouncedAugust 2014January 2005Newer by 116 months
Display sizing3"1.8"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution460k134kSharper display (+326k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Pentax Q-S1

 E-300 Q-S1 
Manual focus Very precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither has Touch friendly display

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax Q-S1 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to travel with your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-300 has external measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Pentax Q-S1 has sizing of 105mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-300 versus Pentax Q-S1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the E-300 against the Q-S1.

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax Q-S1 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and Q-S1 is 67 and 92 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax Q-S1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax Q-S1 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it can be tough to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions purely by looking through a spec sheet. The picture below will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and Q-S1.

Clearly, both of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-300 due to its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF easier and the Pentax Q-S1 will result in more detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax Q-S1 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 Portrait photography factors
Pentax Q-S1 Portrait photography factors
48
you can focus manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
no liveview
low MP (8MP)
46
you can focus manually
offers face detection focusing
delivers RAW formats
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography highlights
Pentax Q-S1 Street photography highlights
51
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
69
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than others (203g)
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography features
Pentax Q-S1 Sports photography features
37
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect auto focus
no liveview
continuous shooting slow (3.0 fps)
no image stabilization
low MP (8 megapixels)
37
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
offers tracking autofocus
max fps very slow (5.0 frames/s)
low MP (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
terrible battery life (250 CIPA)
has no phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-300
Travel photography with Pentax Q-S1
45
has built in flash
lack of Time Lapse recording
low MP (8 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
60
lighter than others (203g)
flash built-in
terrible battery life (250 shots)
low MP (12MP)
does not have selfie friendly display
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography advice
Pentax Q-S1 Landscape photography advice
43
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
tiny screen (1.8 inches)
no liveview
no image stabilization
low MP (8 megapixels)
max ISO too low (400)
lack of Time Lapse recording
55
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Pentax Q mount)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
delivers RAW formats
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
terrible battery life (250 CIPA)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-300
Vlogging with Pentax Q-S1
9
lack of video recording
35
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
offers face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than others (203g)
does not have selfie friendly display
missing external mic port
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax Q-S1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Pentax Q-S1
 Olympus E-300Pentax Q-S1
General Information
Company Olympus Pentax
Model type Olympus E-300 Pentax Q-S1
Other name EVOLT E-300 -
Class Advanced DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Introduced 2005-01-10 2014-08-04
Body design Mid-size SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - Q Engine
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3264 x 2448 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 400 12800
Maximum enhanced ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds Pentax Q
Number of lenses 45 8
Focal length multiplier 2.1 4.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 1.8" 3"
Resolution of display 134 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/8000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 3.0fps 5.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - 4.90 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30, 25, 24p), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24p)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - MPEG-4, H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624 grams (1.38 lb) 203 grams (0.45 lb)
Dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 105 x 58 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 250 photos
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery ID - D-LI68
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Storage slots One One
Pricing at release $800 $250