Olympus E-300 vs Pentax Q-S1
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bac5b/bac5bbb1b3188a701eb58c897a8f12a9e6261c17" alt="Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd627/dd6277e99ef9f564cea30d5ecbfa8cecd5214610" alt="Pentax Q-S1 front Pentax Q-S1 front"
92 Imaging
38 Features
54 Overall
44
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax Q-S1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Introduced January 2005
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-300
- Refreshed by Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 203g - 105 x 58 x 34mm
- Announced August 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax Q-S1 Overview
The following is a comprehensive analysis of the Olympus E-300 versus Pentax Q-S1, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and Q-S1 (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and Q-S1 (1/1.7") feature different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-300 was manufactured 10 years before the Q-S1 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Pentax Q-S1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple overview of how the E-300 grades vs the Q-S1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax Q-S1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-300 & Pentax Q-S1. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Pentax Q-S1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Pentax Q-S1
E-300 | Q-S1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax Q-S1 over the Olympus E-300
Q-S1 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2014 | ![]() | January 2005 | Newer by 116 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 134k | Sharper display (+326k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Pentax Q-S1
E-300 | Q-S1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax Q-S1 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-300 has external measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Pentax Q-S1 has sizing of 105mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-300 versus Pentax Q-S1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the E-300 against the Q-S1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/534ba/534ba8198aed43b91ab5371f04aaaff9543d6358" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Pentax Q-S1 size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Pentax Q-S1 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and Q-S1 is 67 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab715/ab715d1f14d662ea5fb1609d5a64ab1beae9ca67" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Pentax Q-S1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-300 vs Pentax Q-S1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax Q-S1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions purely by looking through a spec sheet. The picture below will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and Q-S1.
Clearly, both of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-300 due to its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF easier and the Pentax Q-S1 will result in more detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7fb75/7fb7518b6d347f0c5ffae8f41673ed94736ed720" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Pentax Q-S1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Pentax Q-S1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4dfba/4dfbafbb2733084889f13abfec92c86c0675b0cf" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-300 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax Q-S1 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Pentax Q-S1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus E-300 | Pentax Q-S1 |
Other name | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2005-01-10 | 2014-08-04 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Q Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 12800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax Q |
Number of lenses | 45 | 8 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 1.8" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 134 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.90 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30, 25, 24p), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24p) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 624 grams (1.38 lb) | 203 grams (0.45 lb) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 105 x 58 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 250 photos |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-LI68 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $800 | $250 |