Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Ricoh CX1

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Ricoh CX1 front
Portability
93
Imaging
32
Features
30
Overall
31

Olympus E-300 vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Introduced January 2005
  • Also Known as EVOLT E-300
  • Renewed by Olympus E-330
Ricoh CX1
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
  • 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
  • Released February 2009
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-300 vs Ricoh CX1 Overview

Following is a in-depth assessment of the Olympus E-300 and Ricoh CX1, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the E-300 (8MP) and the CX1 (9MP) is very close but the E-300 (Four Thirds) and CX1 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor size.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-300 was released 5 years earlier than the CX1 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera.

Before diving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the E-300 matches up vs the CX1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Ricoh CX1

 E-300 CX1 

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Olympus E-300

 CX1 E-300 
ReleasedFebruary 2009January 2005More modern by 50 months
Display size3"1.8"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution920k134kClearer display (+786k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Ricoh CX1

 E-300 CX1 
Focus manually Very precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch display Neither features Touch display

Olympus E-300 vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to carry around your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 enjoys outside dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") having a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX1 has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-300 and Ricoh CX1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using at that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the E-300 compared to the CX1.

Olympus E-300 vs Ricoh CX1 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and CX1 is 67 and 93 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Ricoh CX1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it's tough to see the gap in sensor sizes purely by viewing specifications. The pic below might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and CX1.

Plainly, both of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-300 because of its larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Ricoh CX1 will provide you with greater detail as a result of its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Olympus E-300 vs Ricoh CX1 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-300
Portrait photography with Ricoh CX1
48
focusing manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
no liveview
sensor resolution low (8MP)
25
focusing manually
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
low MP (9MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography info
Ricoh CX1 Street photography info
51
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
55
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-300
Sports photography with Ricoh CX1
37
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
has phase detect AF
no liveview
low fps (3.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8MP)
26
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of shutter priority mode
low MP (9 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography factors
Ricoh CX1 Travel photography factors
45
built-in flash
lack of Time Lapse mode
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
59
built-in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
low MP (9MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography factors
Ricoh CX1 Landscape photography factors
43
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
tiny screen (1.8 inch)
no liveview
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
low max ISO (400)
lack of Time Lapse mode
42
focusing manually
reasonably wide (28mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
lack of manual mode
low MP (9 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-300
Vlogging with Ricoh CX1
9
lack of video recording
28
reasonably wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
screen is not selfie friendly
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of external mic port
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-300 vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Ricoh CX1
 Olympus E-300Ricoh CX1
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus E-300 Ricoh CX1
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-300 -
Category Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2005-01-10 2009-02-19
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 9MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest Possible resolution 3264 x 2448 3456 x 2592
Maximum native ISO 400 1600
Maximum enhanced ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-200mm (7.1x)
Highest aperture - f/3.3-5.2
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 1.8" 3"
Resolution of screen 134 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 8 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - 3.00 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 640x480
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624 gr (1.38 lbs) 180 gr (0.40 lbs)
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID - DB-70
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse feature
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Launch price $800 $299