Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Ricoh PX

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Ricoh PX front
Portability
95
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37

Olympus E-300 vs Ricoh PX Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Announced January 2005
  • Other Name is EVOLT E-300
  • Renewed by Olympus E-330
Ricoh PX
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
  • 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
  • Released August 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-300 vs Ricoh PX Overview

Here, we are comparing the Olympus E-300 versus Ricoh PX, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and PX (16MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and PX (1/2.3") have totally different sensor dimensions.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-300 was launched 7 years prior to the PX which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Ricoh PX being a Compact camera.

Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple summary of how the E-300 matches up against the PX with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Ricoh PX

 E-300 PX 

Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Olympus E-300

 PX E-300 
ReleasedAugust 2011January 2005More modern by 80 months
Display size2.7"1.8"Larger display (+0.9")
Display resolution230k134kCrisper display (+96k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Ricoh PX

 E-300 PX 
Manually focus Very precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither provides Touch friendly display

Olympus E-300 vs Ricoh PX Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to carry around your camera often, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-300 provides physical dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Ricoh PX has measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-300 versus Ricoh PX in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the E-300 vs the PX.

Olympus E-300 vs Ricoh PX size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and PX is 67 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Ricoh PX top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Ricoh PX Sensor Comparison

More often than not, its hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizes only by going over specs. The picture below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and PX.

All in all, the 2 cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-300 because of its larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Ricoh PX will deliver greater detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-300 vs Ricoh PX sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Ricoh PX Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Ricoh PX Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 Portrait photography highlights
Ricoh PX Portrait photography highlights
48
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
no liveview
MP count low (8 megapixels)
43
has manual focus
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
has face detection focusing
no external flash support
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography features
Ricoh PX Street photography features
51
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
63
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
no moving screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography info
Ricoh PX Sports photography info
37
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect autofocus
no liveview
slow frames per second (3.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (8 megapixels)
44
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16MP)
has tracking autofocus
environment proofing
slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography advice
Ricoh PX Travel photography advice
45
has built in flash
lack of Timelapse mode
MP count low (8 megapixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
68
environment proofing
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
quite wide (28mm)
missing Timelapse function
display isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.9)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-300
Landscape photography with Ricoh PX
43
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (1.8 inch)
no liveview
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (8MP)
low max ISO (400)
lack of Timelapse mode
47
has manual focus
quite wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
environment proofing
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
missing Timelapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging factors
Ricoh PX Vlogging factors
9
can't record video
31
quite wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focusing
slow max aperture (f3.9)
display isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing external microphone port
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-300 vs Ricoh PX Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Ricoh PX
 Olympus E-300Ricoh PX
General Information
Brand Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus E-300 Ricoh PX
Other name EVOLT E-300 -
Type Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2005-01-10 2011-08-16
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Maximum resolution 3264 x 2448 4608 x 3072
Maximum native ISO 400 3200
Maximum boosted ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.9-5.4
Macro focus range - 3cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 1.8" 2.7"
Resolution of display 134k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 8 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 3.50 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 624 gr (1.38 lbs) 156 gr (0.34 lbs)
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - DB-100
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse recording
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Retail cost $800 $329