Olympus E-300 vs Ricoh PX
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
95 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus E-300 vs Ricoh PX Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Announced January 2005
- Other Name is EVOLT E-300
- Renewed by Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Released August 2011
Olympus E-300 vs Ricoh PX Overview
Here, we are comparing the Olympus E-300 versus Ricoh PX, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and PX (16MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and PX (1/2.3") have totally different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-300 was launched 7 years prior to the PX which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Ricoh PX being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple summary of how the E-300 matches up against the PX with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-300 vs Ricoh PX Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-300 & Ricoh PX. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Ricoh PX Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Ricoh PX
E-300 | PX |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Olympus E-300
PX | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2011 | January 2005 | More modern by 80 months | |
Display size | 2.7" | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.9") | |
Display resolution | 230k | 134k | Crisper display (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Ricoh PX
E-300 | PX | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-300 vs Ricoh PX Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera often, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-300 provides physical dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Ricoh PX has measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-300 versus Ricoh PX in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the E-300 vs the PX.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and PX is 67 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Ricoh PX Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizes only by going over specs. The picture below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and PX.
All in all, the 2 cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-300 because of its larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Ricoh PX will deliver greater detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-300 vs Ricoh PX Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-300 vs Ricoh PX Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Ricoh PX | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Ricoh PX |
Other name | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2005-01-10 | 2011-08-16 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3072 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.4 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 1.8" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 134k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624 gr (1.38 lbs) | 156 gr (0.34 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | DB-100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $800 | $329 |