Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung DV150F

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Samsung DV150F front
Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
29
Overall
35

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung DV150F Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Announced January 2005
  • Also Known as EVOLT E-300
  • Successor is Olympus E-330
Samsung DV150F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
  • 116g - 96 x 55 x 18mm
  • Released January 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung DV150F Overview

In this write-up, we are evaluating the Olympus E-300 vs Samsung DV150F, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Samsung. There exists a big gap between the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and DV150F (16MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and DV150F (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizes.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-300 was brought out 9 years before the DV150F and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung DV150F being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the E-300 matches up vs the DV150F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Samsung DV150F

 E-300 DV150F 
Manually focus More accurate focusing

Reasons to pick Samsung DV150F over the Olympus E-300

 DV150F E-300 
ReleasedJanuary 2013January 2005Fresher by 97 months
Display sizing2.7"1.8"Larger display (+0.9")
Display resolution460k134kCrisper display (+326k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Samsung DV150F

 E-300 DV150F 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung DV150F Physical Comparison

If you're going to carry your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 has physical dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") having a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Samsung DV150F has dimensions of 96mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-300 vs Samsung DV150F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using during that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the E-300 vs the DV150F.

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung DV150F size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and DV150F is 67 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung DV150F top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung DV150F Sensor Comparison

Normally, its tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizing simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The graphic here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and DV150F.

Clearly, the two cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-300 because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Samsung DV150F will offer extra detail having its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images a little more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung DV150F sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung DV150F Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung DV150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 Portrait photography information
Samsung DV150F Portrait photography information
48
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
no liveview
low resolution (8 megapixels)
34
MP count decent (16MP)
has face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
can't use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography factors
Samsung DV150F Street photography factors
51
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
56
lighter than competition (116g)
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung DV150F as a Sports photography camera
37
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect autofocus
no liveview
low fps (3.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
low resolution (8MP)
36
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
has tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography features
Samsung DV150F Travel photography features
45
built-in flash
missing Time Lapse mode
low resolution (8 megapixels)
does not have a selfie friendly display
69
lighter than competition (116 grams)
MP count decent (16MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography advice
Samsung DV150F Landscape photography advice
43
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
tiny screen (1.8 inch)
no liveview
does not have image stabilization
low resolution (8 megapixels)
maximum ISO low (400)
missing Time Lapse mode
34
pretty wide (25mm)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
lack of Time Lapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-300
Vlogging with Samsung DV150F
9
lack of video recording
31
pretty wide (25mm)
touchscreen capability
has face detect focus
lighter than competition (116g)
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of mic port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung DV150F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Samsung DV150F
 Olympus E-300Samsung DV150F
General Information
Company Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus E-300 Samsung DV150F
Also referred to as EVOLT E-300 -
Class Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2005-01-10 2013-01-07
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Full resolution 3264 x 2448 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 400 3200
Max boosted ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 3 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-125mm (5.0x)
Max aperture - f/2.5-6.3
Total lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 1.8 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 134 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen technology - Rear TFT LCD + 1.5 inch front LCd
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 8s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye -
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - MPEG-4, H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624 gr (1.38 lbs) 116 gr (0.26 lbs)
Dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 96 x 55 x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC
Storage slots One One
Launch cost $800 $150