Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung EX2F

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Samsung EX2F front
Portability
90
Imaging
37
Features
62
Overall
47

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Launched January 2005
  • Also Known as EVOLT E-300
  • Replacement is Olympus E-330
Samsung EX2F
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
  • 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
  • Announced December 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung EX2F Overview

Following is a in-depth overview of the Olympus E-300 vs Samsung EX2F, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There is a significant difference among the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and EX2F (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and EX2F (1/1.7") offer totally different sensor size.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-300 was brought out 9 years earlier than the EX2F which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung EX2F being a Compact camera.

Before going straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a short highlight of how the E-300 matches up versus the EX2F for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

				

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Samsung EX2F

 E-300 EX2F 
Display resolution134k0kClearer display (+134k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Olympus E-300

 EX2F E-300 
AnnouncedDecember 2012January 2005More modern by 96 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display dimensions3"1.8"Larger display (+1.2")
Selfie screen Take selfies

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Samsung EX2F

 E-300 EX2F 
Manual focus Dial accurate focusing
Touch friendly display Lack of Touch friendly display

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-300 has physical dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Samsung EX2F has measurements of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-300 vs Samsung EX2F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the E-300 and the EX2F.

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung EX2F size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and EX2F is 67 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung EX2F top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it's hard to see the gap in sensor sizes just by looking through specs. The picture underneath might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and EX2F.

All in all, each of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-300 because of its larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Samsung EX2F will provide you with more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung EX2F sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 Portrait photography info
Samsung EX2F Portrait photography info
48
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
does not have liveview
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
42
focusing manually
delivers RAW formats
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography factors
Samsung EX2F Street photography factors
51
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
68
screen articulates fully
image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW formats
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
heavier than competition in class (294 grams)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography information
Samsung EX2F Sports photography information
37
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect autofocus
does not have liveview
slow fps (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
31
image stabilization (Optical)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
has no phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography factors
Samsung EX2F Travel photography factors
45
built-in flash
missing Timelapse recording
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
66
has built in flash
selfie friendly screen
really wide (24mm)
good max aperture (f1.4)
lack of Time Lapse function
heavier than competition in class (294 grams)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography info
Samsung EX2F Landscape photography info
43
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
tiny screen (1.8 inches)
does not have liveview
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8MP)
maximum ISO low (400)
missing Timelapse recording
53
focusing manually
really wide (24mm)
good max aperture (f1.4)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW formats
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
lack of Time Lapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging highlights
Samsung EX2F Vlogging highlights
9
can't record video
71
really wide (24mm)
good max aperture (f1.4)
selfie friendly screen
image stabilization (Optical)
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lack of external mic jack
heavier than competition in class (294 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung EX2F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Samsung EX2F
 Olympus E-300Samsung EX2F
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus E-300 Samsung EX2F
Also called as EVOLT E-300 -
Category Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2005-01-10 2012-12-18
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Peak resolution 3264 x 2448 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 400 3200
Highest enhanced ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 3 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-80mm (3.3x)
Maximum aperture - f/1.4-2.7
Amount of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 4.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen size 1.8" 3"
Resolution of screen 134k dot 0k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology - AMOLED
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Electronic (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s -
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s -
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624g (1.38 lb) 294g (0.65 lb)
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 48
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 20.0
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 11.5
DXO Low light rating not tested 209
Other
Battery ID - SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Launch cost $800 $478