Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ10W

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Samsung HZ10W front
Portability
90
Imaging
32
Features
27
Overall
30

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ10W Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Released January 2005
  • Also referred to as EVOLT E-300
  • Successor is Olympus E-330
Samsung HZ10W
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
  • 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
  • Introduced May 2009
  • Alternate Name is WB500
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ10W Overview

Lets look closer at the Olympus E-300 versus Samsung HZ10W, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the E-300 (8MP) and the HZ10W (10MP) is fairly comparable but the E-300 (Four Thirds) and HZ10W (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizes.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-300 was launched 5 years prior to the HZ10W which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung HZ10W being a Compact camera.

Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-300 matches up against the HZ10W when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Samsung HZ10W

 E-300 HZ10W 

Reasons to pick Samsung HZ10W over the Olympus E-300

 HZ10W E-300 
IntroducedMay 2009January 2005More modern by 52 months
Display dimensions2.7"1.8"Larger display (+0.9")
Display resolution230k134kSharper display (+96k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Samsung HZ10W

 E-300 HZ10W 
Focus manually Very accurate focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither offers Touch friendly display

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ10W Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to carry around your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 offers exterior dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Samsung HZ10W has specifications of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") and a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-300 versus Samsung HZ10W in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-300 against the HZ10W.

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ10W size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and HZ10W is 67 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ10W top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ10W Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizes just by seeing specs. The pic below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and HZ10W.

As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-300 due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Samsung HZ10W will provide extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ10W sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ10W Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ10W Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung HZ10W as a Portrait photography camera
48
has manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
no liveview
low resolution sensor (8MP)
30
has manual focus
comes with face detect autofocus
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Street photography camera
Samsung HZ10W as a Street photography camera
51
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
52
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
heavier than competitors in class (249 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-300
Sports photography with Samsung HZ10W
37
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
has phase detect auto focus
no liveview
max fps low (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
low resolution sensor (8MP)
26
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority mode
low megapixels (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung HZ10W as a Travel photography camera
45
has built in flash
missing Time Lapse recording
low resolution sensor (8 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
53
built-in flash
rather wide (24mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
heavier than competitors in class (249g)
low megapixels (10MP)
does not have selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung HZ10W as a Landscape photography camera
43
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
screen is small (1.8")
no liveview
lack of image stabilization
low resolution sensor (8MP)
max ISO too low (400)
missing Time Lapse recording
35
has manual focus
rather wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
manual mode not possible
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
lack of Time Lapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-300
Vlogging with Samsung HZ10W
9
can't record video
28
rather wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect autofocus
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
does not have selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of mic port
heavier than competitors in class (249 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ10W Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Samsung HZ10W
 Olympus E-300Samsung HZ10W
General Information
Make Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus E-300 Samsung HZ10W
Also referred to as EVOLT E-300 WB500
Category Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Released 2005-01-10 2009-05-14
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Max resolution 3264 x 2448 3648 x 2432
Max native ISO 400 3200
Max enhanced ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-240mm (10.0x)
Largest aperture - f/3.3-5.8
Macro focus range - 5cm
Total lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 1.8 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 134k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 16 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1500 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 3.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 624 gr (1.38 lb) 249 gr (0.55 lb)
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse feature
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II) SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Storage slots Single Single
Launch price $800 $300