Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ10W
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
90 Imaging
32 Features
27 Overall
30
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ10W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Released January 2005
- Also referred to as EVOLT E-300
- Successor is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Introduced May 2009
- Alternate Name is WB500
Photography Glossary Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ10W Overview
Lets look closer at the Olympus E-300 versus Samsung HZ10W, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the E-300 (8MP) and the HZ10W (10MP) is fairly comparable but the E-300 (Four Thirds) and HZ10W (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-300 was launched 5 years prior to the HZ10W which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung HZ10W being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-300 matches up against the HZ10W when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ10W Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-300 & Samsung HZ10W. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Samsung HZ10W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Samsung HZ10W
| E-300 | HZ10W |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ10W over the Olympus E-300
| HZ10W | E-300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2009 | January 2005 | More modern by 52 months | |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.9") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 134k | Sharper display (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Samsung HZ10W
| E-300 | HZ10W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very accurate focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ10W Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 offers exterior dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Samsung HZ10W has specifications of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") and a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-300 versus Samsung HZ10W in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-300 against the HZ10W.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and HZ10W is 67 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ10W Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizes just by seeing specs. The pic below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and HZ10W.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-300 due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Samsung HZ10W will provide extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ10W Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ10W Specifications
| Olympus E-300 | Samsung HZ10W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus E-300 | Samsung HZ10W |
| Also referred to as | EVOLT E-300 | WB500 |
| Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2005-01-10 | 2009-05-14 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3648 x 2432 |
| Max native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Total lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 1.8 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 134k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 624 gr (1.38 lb) | 249 gr (0.55 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $800 | $300 |