Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ15W

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Samsung HZ15W front
Portability
90
Imaging
34
Features
31
Overall
32

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ15W Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Launched January 2005
  • Additionally Known as EVOLT E-300
  • Later Model is Olympus E-330
Samsung HZ15W
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
  • 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
  • Introduced February 2009
  • Additionally Known as WB550
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ15W Overview

Here is a in-depth comparison of the Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ15W, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and HZ15W (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and HZ15W (1/2.3") use totally different sensor measurements.

Photography Glossary

The E-300 was launched 5 years prior to the HZ15W and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung HZ15W being a Compact camera.

Before diving through a full comparison, below is a quick summation of how the E-300 grades vs the HZ15W in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Samsung HZ15W

 E-300 HZ15W 

Reasons to pick Samsung HZ15W over the Olympus E-300

 HZ15W E-300 
IntroducedFebruary 2009January 2005Fresher by 50 months
Display dimension3"1.8"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution460k134kCrisper display (+326k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Samsung HZ15W

 E-300 HZ15W 
Focus manually More accurate focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch display Neither includes Touch display

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ15W Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to carry your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 features outer dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") having a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ15W has specifications of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") having a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ15W in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the E-300 and the HZ15W.

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ15W size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and HZ15W is 67 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ15W top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ15W Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, its hard to envision the difference between sensor sizing only by reading specifications. The graphic below will give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and HZ15W.

To sum up, both of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-300 because of its larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Samsung HZ15W will offer you greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ15W sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ15W Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ15W Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung HZ15W as a Portrait photography camera
48
focusing manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
no liveview feature
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
31
you can focus manually
has face detection focusing
no manual mode
no external flash support
low MP (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography advice
Samsung HZ15W Street photography advice
51
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
52
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
heavier than average (249 grams)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-300
Sports photography with Samsung HZ15W
37
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
has phase detect autofocus
no liveview feature
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8MP)
27
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of shutter priority mode
low MP (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography highlights
Samsung HZ15W Travel photography highlights
45
built-in flash
missing Time Lapse mode
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
54
built-in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
heavier than average (249g)
low MP (12MP)
does not have a selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-300
Landscape photography with Samsung HZ15W
43
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
small screen (1.8")
no liveview feature
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8MP)
max ISO too low (400)
missing Time Lapse mode
40
you can focus manually
relatively wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
no manual mode
low MP (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
does not have Time Lapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung HZ15W as a Vlogging camera
9
no video
28
relatively wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focusing
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
does not have a selfie friendly display
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have external mic support
heavier than average (249 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ15W Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Samsung HZ15W
 Olympus E-300Samsung HZ15W
General Information
Make Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus E-300 Samsung HZ15W
Also Known as EVOLT E-300 WB550
Class Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2005-01-10 2009-02-23
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Peak resolution 3264 x 2448 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 400 3200
Highest enhanced ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-240mm (10.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.3-5.8
Macro focusing range - 5cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 1.8" 3"
Resolution of display 134k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 16 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 3.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - 4.70 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1280x720
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624g (1.38 lb) 249g (0.55 lb)
Dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse recording
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II) SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Card slots One One
Price at release $800 $330