Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ25W

Portability
67
Imaging
40
Features
31
Overall
36
Olympus E-300 front
 
Samsung HZ25W front
Portability
70
Imaging
34
Features
32
Overall
33

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ25W Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Revealed January 2005
  • Alternative Name is EVOLT E-300
  • Renewed by Olympus E-330
Samsung HZ25W
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
  • 428g - 116 x 83 x 92mm
  • Revealed July 2010
  • Alternate Name is WB5000
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ25W Overview

Let's examine more in depth at the Olympus E-300 and Samsung HZ25W, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and HZ25W (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and HZ25W (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-300 was unveiled 6 years prior to the HZ25W and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung HZ25W being a Compact camera.

Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple view of how the E-300 grades versus the HZ25W in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Samsung HZ25W

 E-300 HZ25W 

Reasons to pick Samsung HZ25W over the Olympus E-300

 HZ25W E-300 
RevealedJuly 2010January 2005Fresher by 66 months
Screen dimension3"1.8"Bigger screen (+1.2")
Screen resolution230k134kCrisper screen (+96k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Samsung HZ25W

 E-300 HZ25W 
Focus manually Very accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lacking Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ25W Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-300 has outer dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Samsung HZ25W has measurements of 116mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") with a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-300 and Samsung HZ25W in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the E-300 and the HZ25W.

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ25W size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and HZ25W is 67 and 70 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ25W top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ25W Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is difficult to see the contrast in sensor sizing simply by researching a spec sheet. The visual here will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and HZ25W.

As you can see, both of those cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-300 having a bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Samsung HZ25W will render extra detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The older E-300 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ25W sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-300
Portrait photography with Samsung HZ25W
48
manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
no liveview
low resolution (8MP)
33
you can focus manually
supports RAW files
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography factors
Samsung HZ25W Street photography factors
51
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
55
image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW files
no articulating screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung HZ25W as a Sports photography camera
36
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect autofocus
no liveview
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
low resolution (8 megapixels)
33
long zoom range (26-624mm 24.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
no shutter priority
low MP (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung HZ25W as a Travel photography camera
44
has built in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
low resolution (8MP)
display is not selfie friendly
51
flash built-in
decently wide (26mm)
very long zoom (624mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
low MP (12 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography features
Samsung HZ25W Landscape photography features
42
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
screen is small (1.8 inches)
no liveview
does not have image stabilization
low resolution (8 megapixels)
low max ISO (400)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
43
you can focus manually
decently wide (26mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW files
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
no manual mode
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging details
Samsung HZ25W Vlogging details
9
lack of video recording
24
decently wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have mic port
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ25W Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Samsung HZ25W
 Olympus E-300Samsung HZ25W
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus E-300 Samsung HZ25W
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-300 WB5000
Type Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2005-01-10 2010-07-06
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 3264 x 2448 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 400 3200
Max enhanced ISO 1600 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 64
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 26-624mm (24.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.8-5.0
Macro focus range - 10cm
Available lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 1.8" 3"
Display resolution 134 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 16 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 3.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - 5.60 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 624 gr (1.38 lb) 428 gr (0.94 lb)
Dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 116 x 83 x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) SC/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Pricing at release $800 $350